Ah sorry, I’m getting the terms confused.
Ah sorry, I’m getting the terms confused.
Oh, this is actually a useful feature, then.
I see it quite a lot, personally. Democrats are blaming other Pro-palestine democrats for not voting for pro-Israel candidates.
I think there’s a technical hurdle here. There’s no reliable way to enforce unique access to an NFT. Anyone with access to the wallet’s private key (or seed phrase) can use the NFT, meaning two or more people could easily share a game or software license just by sharing credentials. That kind of undermines the licensing control in a system like this.
I don’t think NFTs can do that either. Collections are copied to another contract address all the time. There isn’t a way to verify if there isn’t another copy of an NFT on the blockchain.
Pole which disappears part way down the wall. His left arm is transparent. The person isn’t on the bed but behind it. The shadows are all messed up too.
Is this the right article? It said they just did a test.
The “tokenization” you hear credit card companies using like Mastercard is cryptography. It isn’t cryptocurrency or blockchain. When people say “crypto” isn’t being used, they mean blockchain in this case.
Tokenization is when the number on your payment card is replaced with a ”stand-in” number that is saved in your phone or watch or the merchant’s site where you register your card. Tokenization protects your account by using that token instead of your real card number, which the merchant never sees or stores.
https://www.mastercard.com/news/perspectives/2024/what-is-tokenization/
LFG!!! SNP500 🚀 🌕 📈
Pamp it!
That’s an interesting perspective on things and gives me something to think about.
True, it’s just a voting system. It can’t do those things unless people vote for those things to happen.
The thing RCV does do is break us out of the control of a 2-party government. So we could have a communist party with RCV, but can’t in our current system.
How are you measuring useless?
Australia has RCV and has more than 2 active political parties.
It’s up to the states. It already implemented in Maine and Alaska, with a majority of people in those state approving of it.
It’s kind of why we need Ranked Choice Voting.
I honestly feel like I can do better in this area. Thanks for the post. Gives me something to think about.
Okay, but like this is kind of a smart way to squash the paid protester conspiracy theories.
“Soros is paying people to dance against Trump.” just sounds rediculous.
Good point. Why would an atheist hate something which doesn’t exist. The whole meme is bad.
No surprise there. We just went through how blockchain is going to drastically help our lives in some unspecified future.
The bottom-left one for Feminists doesn’t fit. The others are things that were created by their own group, for example, the KKK was created by Christians. That Feminist meme, on the other hand, wasn’t created by feminists but by someone else to mock them.
But you would need a centralized authority to say which one is the “right contract”. If a centralized authority is necessary in this case, then there is less benefit of using NFTs. It’s no longer a decentralized.