Microsoft, doing it’s part to make the world a better place.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No it won’t.

    240 million grandmas, cheapskate businesses, and cash-strapped public schools will continue to use whatever operating system their computers already have, forever, until they break, security implications be damned.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve got a computer with a copy of XP on it that still runs. Not connected to the Internet anymore, but it still functions as a computer otherwise.

  • kinther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I built a new PC last year and bought a copy of Windows 11. Holy moly the login process required so much bullshit that I skipped through. It also every few days tries to get me to go through it again. After learning about all the Spyware and other bullshit I decided to just take the plunge back into using Linux as a main OS.

    • LockheedTheDragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A couple of years ago I was trying to reinstall Windows 10 without Internet. I hadn’t bought a switch for that room yet so ended up having to unplug another computer so Windows “Special Snowflake” 10 would let me a little easlier set up the admin and user.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like MS could avoid everyone’s gripes by simply not charging for their security update program. 7 to 13+ years is going to more than cover when most people would’ve upgraded anyway.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not how software works. Maintaining an OS until the end of time is a real problem.

      Should they be maintaining the beloved windows xp still?

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. I’m just looking at the machines that were purchased at the launch of Win 11, but might not have had the proper hardware to transition off 10. I would assume that computers on a that cusp will mostly support 11, but if the extended updates were free, it would ensure those machines would have had 7 years of security updates - which seems like a reasonable lifespan for a computer these days.

        Making those updates free would also mean computers that were 13+ years old were also getting security updates, so maybe my recommendation is overkill.

        At some point you just need to move on and stop taking customer service calls from people with old hardware.

        • mark3748@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed. I’m just looking at the machines that were purchased at the launch of Win 11, but might not have had the proper hardware to transition off 10.

          Windows 11 launched in 2021. The bare minimum hardware (8th gen intel) is from 2017. If you were buying 5+ year old hardware in 2021 then that’s on you.

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t forget the TPM module! Which has also been pretty damn ubiquitous on mobos for a long ass time.

            This is all just clickbait and easy upvotes on lemmy with the big pro-linux movement.

      • krigo666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is that that hardware, and older, is still perfectly capable of preforming modern desktop tasks. I have a 12 year old Athlon FX 8320 with 32GB RAM that works great, not the most efficient processor in terms of energy but runs everything well, yet it’s not supported. Honestly I don’t give a shit about Winblows, I work with Linux (system administrator) and I only use Win10 for some gaming. That said, I have a newer Ryzen 9 5950X with 128GB RAM to work with virtualization, and it will stay on Win10 till no longer being sustainable.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gaming is the primary driver behind my PC choices by a humongous margin. I’m not really concerned about imvasive anti-cheat software, I don’t want to tinker with settings, I want to turn on my computer and play video games. That means I use Windows.

    • pascal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get the joke, but lots of people, me included, start to understand why people pay so much for a Mac. It’s not the hardware, it’s not having to deal with Windows.

        • pascal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have 20 years of experience in Linux. I’m not the average “I’m using Arch btw” Linux user. I managed several services at work with Linux and have a homelab at home.

          If I wasn’t a PC gamer, Windows was gone from my house. That’s how I prefer Linux.

          Having said that, your statement is objectively wrong.

    • Trollception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uh I don’t have time or wish to subject myself to the frustration that is Linux. I’ve tried it at least 5 times in the past 10 years and strongly prefer Windows.