• 74 183.84@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    I think its crazy that they made $800 mil worth of these cars. Who the hell thought they would sell well?

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    Time to play…”WHO DO YA BAIL OUT! HUBBA-HUBBA-HUBBA, MONEY-MONEY-MONEY…WHO DO YA BAIL OOOOOUUUUUUUUT?!”

  • Daryl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    How abut: The truck is just plain ugly.

    It looks like a refuse bin. Square back, low opening front.

    When I worked in a lime quarry, we used a bin something like that shape to put all the crap and garbage in The a-frame had a bar across the top and the kiln truck picked it up worth its hoist and loaded it on the back, and hauled away the load to the dump.

  • SSNs4evr@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    If he drops the price to about $8k and includes lifetime fast charging, I’d consider one. Of course, for $8k, there are plenty of much nicer used trucks available on the market, though.

  • Netux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    $800 million worth is giving a lot of value to something they can barely give away. Maybe $800K worth of material after the cost of dismantling.

    • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      The $800m figure is only useful for figuring out how much Tesla was expecting to make out of it. When you factor in the development and manufacturing costs, they’re hemorrhaging money.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      Yeah, a better number would be how much it cost to build the fuckers. I’m assuming they also need ongoing maintenance while they sit around rusting.

    • Lukas Murch@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They really should use the number of units. If Musk cranks the price from 80k to 120k, they suddenly have $1.2B sitting there? It’s the same 10,000 ugly-ass pieces of shit.

    • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      Hell yeah if I could get a free cybertruck I’d have lots of fun salvaging the motors, batteries, sensors, etc.!

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          This is very doable without needing an EV battery. Solar panels and lithium batteries have never been so cheap - tho I’m not in America, maybe tariffs effect this in the US. I have a 500w panel, victron shunt, controller, etc, 200ah lithium battery - the whole build cost maybe £800 a couple of years ago and the cost has dropped a fair bit since. I live in a small space and my needs are few - laptop, lights, phone, heater, etc. This does the job fine for me but it wouldn’t be hard to scale up.

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Strip out the bad stuff and drop them in the ocean and they can become reefs for fishies and their buddies?

  • Mark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If nobody wants them… they are not worth that amount. simple economics.

    supply and demand…

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is exactly right. They’re worthless if nobody is willing to pay what’s being asked.

      So what they’re “worth” is nothing.

    • irish_link@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I know i would get made fun of for this but a good price is a good price. I would pay $15,000 for one. I think most people would.

      Edit 2 min later - I thought better of it. No i still wouldn’t want it. I wouldn’t trust Tesla not to hack it at some point and take it over.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You could rip the batteries out of them and use them for a solar setup. The rest could be sold for scrap.

        • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Probably an unpopular opinion, but I’d love to take that as a project vehicle.

          Batteries for home setup (on TOU plan, so it’d be nice to charge when rates are low and discharge when high).
          Then slap an combustion engine in there that just acts as a power plant for the electric motors. It’d probably be biting off more than I can chew, but it sounds like a hell of a learning opportunity and tickles my engineering/tinker brain’s fancy.

          Of course, after blowing something up, I’d probably focus on dissecting the drive train and using them motors for something else. I’m suddenly curious what the suspension set up is like. If they’ve got some crazy high tech mag-ride system, I’ll bet that could be repurposed for another vehicle (pending Tesla proprietary protocols for connecting to ECU).

          But now I’m rambling. The thoughts of what I could do with those parts though.

          Ninjaedit: just took a look as some of the pondering above. I forgot how silly the interiors look, so def wouldn’t bother with attempting it as a project car.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I would pay $15,000 for one.

        I would pay $15k for a better vehicle. I’m not getting in The Truck That Kills You Instantly.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I would totally take one for 15k (only if its used, never from tesla itself) take the batteries out, sell those and put the frame on a truck and drive it out to an event or protest and let people smash whats left. Let people rent a sledge hammer for a bit and vent, would be a fun and very public statement. Once thats done sell it as scrap. The batteries should alone should cover the next one.

  • Tantheiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I wonder if people don’t want the truck because of its design or the association with Elon more.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Does it really matter? It’s a shit looking vehicle that can’t drive in the rain if you don’t switch to carwash? Mode? I think?

      The vehicle has so many design oddities, so many manufacturing problems, and it’s associated to one of the least liked billionaires in recent memory, so much so that people in the general public go out of their way too vandalize the vehicle whenever the opportunity presents itself.

      What’s to like about it? Even if you don’t hate Elon, and don’t hate the look/design, the"truck" is a meme at best and a gigantic waste of resources.

    • limelight79@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s a novelty vehicle.

      It’s too big for many people. It’s not as functional (in terms of towing and hauling) as a regular pickup. People who buy pickups for business uses are, for the most part, are going to be very nervous about buying an electric vehicle from a relatively new manufacturer.

      Even if you put aside the issues with Elon: The issue with the Cybertruck is that Elon never understood it was a novelty vehicle. The traditional auto manufacturers make these novelty vehicles from time to time, but the difference is that they understand what they’re building and know they’re only going to sell 10,000 or something per year, and probably for a short run.

      Elon’s so far up his own ass that he doesn’t understand why everyone isn’t buying one.

      • Tantheiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I actually really like the look of it. It’s so ugly.

        Also paint. I hate seeing paint chips on my car. I know I can wrap but that’s an extra expense to eat.

        I just can’t see myself buying a new Tesla due to the damage Elon has caused. It’s a shame because my current Tesla is a wonderful car, in my opinion.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m forced to say that some of the wraps and textures added to the vehicles do make them look cool again.

          But I feel like that’s equivalent to saying “Once you drown the turd in whipped cream and cherries, it looks edible.” I mean, fuck, I suppose so. But I know what’s underneath so I’m not touching that spoon.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “nobody wants” or 60% of Americans can’t afford basic living expenses?

    • octobob@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Even if I could afford one, or want one, which I don’t for many reasons, the vehicle is so ginormous that it would be the biggest pain in the ass in the world to drive around my city. Parallel parking? Forget it. Narrow side streets that are the width of a car, but somehow you need to let someone come down directly towards you and it’s not a one way? Bumpy roads full of potholes or worn down to the original brick roads, with the vehicle that’s tires wear out faster than any other due to the sheer weight?

      I think you get the idea

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        For all we know lots of people want them but can’t afford them.

        Paints two completely different scenarios from the same objective base observation that there are X amount of unsold Cybertrucks.

        • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Why is that all you know and why are you lumping us in with you?

          They’ve got ~60% more inventory than sales (6k sold).

          For comparison Rivian has 400% more sales than inventory. (14k sold).

          This should be plenty of data to conclude how popular the Cybertruck actually is.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Are you comparing the same time frames? Because Rivian’s sales are down 36% for Q1 2025.

            I guess no one wants them either, or would a headline about Rivian invoke some other reason?

            That’s my point.

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Rivian didn’t over produce, and notably, didn’t go all in with the new authoritarian regime. Also, a 36% decrease in sales is much less than having $800 million (in MSRP) sitting in lots. The R1T is a very successful vehicle if you compare it to the Swastitruck.