Mama told me not to come.
She said, that ain’t the way to have fun.
Yeah, NextCloud doesn’t follow ideal containerization style, but they do have an FPM package, so I can co figure PHP FPM separately from the web server, which is separate from my Collabora container. I don’t use the AIO image so I can control each piece separately.
Yahoo?
PHP isn’t complex, you just need a webserver (nginx, Apache, etc) and PHP. That’s one process (webserver) that runs a few child processes (PHP scripts). When using PHP fpm, use two containers.
Each container should run one process. Each container can run whatever base you want. If you want a newer PHP on an older image, go for it! Nobody is forcing you to use the repo version of PHP, you can install it separately. More complexity should mean more containers, not more complex containers.
Really?
I’m going to lose the dongle, that’s the problem. If it’s built-in to the device, there’s nothing to lose.
What’s the benefit of losing a popular port? I don’t need my phone to be waterproof, nor do I care if my phone is slightly thicker. So it just feels like a downgrade.
I’m honestly surprised anyone puts any more weight into it than a conversion starter. Most of my team scores largely the same, yet each of us is very different in terms of work style. In fact, one of our introverts really likes direct collaboration, and one of our extroverts really doesn’t. It’s really not an indication of anything.
Maybe. It could also be a big nothingburger.
Sure. My point is that GrapheneOS can’t do much until Fairphone does their part.
Wow, really? We only do it like a couple weeks after hiring, and you can respectfully refuse. We just do it as a “get to know you” meeting so we can get the team familiar with the new hire.
uBlock Origin on Firefox-based browsers.
Yeah, I could live with the charging, provided it can charge overnight. The volume is the real concern.
Cool!
I’m happy to answer any other questions.
BTW, Aurora is just an alternative frontend to the Play Store, it has the same apps, but you can use an anonymous profile instead of logging in with a Google account.
Warren Buffet comes to mind
But Warren Buffet does know what he’s doing. He doesn’t buy based on charts though, he buys based on fundamentals, and many of his bets take years to prove themselves.
I think this is more applicable to the vast swarms of YT influencers who push trading software. Get enough viewers and rent enough Lambos and people will think you know something. Or maybe even people like Jim Cramer, who has a mediocre success rate in his own trading firm, yet still has his picks get parroted because he has a TV show.
Don’t blindly buy stuff because someone else tells you to, or even because someone else does. Buy stuff because you know what you’re doing. If you don’t know what you’re doing (the vast majority of people), just buy diversified index funds. In the US, this means something like VTI and VXUS, or the various equivalents in various brokerages/retirement plans. That’s what I do, and I’ve had a pretty good experience so far, no experience reading tea leaves required.
And apparently my team at work. It’s more of a curiosity (oh, you’re somewhat extroverted? Interesting!), and it gives us a chance to ask questions to get to know a new hire.
If you’re making actual decisions based on the MBTI test, then that’s on you. But it’s kinda fun to compare.
Looks like a lot of “Partial” support. Some concerns:
Maybe it’s fine? Idk.
I would say it’s closer to filters are something to curate what you see, and moderation is to curate the community.
That’s the traditional definition, sure. Traditional moderation essentially forces others to not see certain content based on the moderator’s opinion, and that’s incompatible with a properly P2P application where there is no central authority.
Perhaps here’s a more satisfactory definition:
So an individual client wouldn’t have the CP, gore, etc content for a given community because it has been moderated out. However, another user with different moderation settings might still have that content on their machine. If most people in the network remove the content, then the content is effectively gone since it won’t be shared, but there’s no guarantee that nobody has that content. Content nobody sees value in will disappear, since things are only kept when someone wants it.
Make sense? The only exception here is for that moderation queue, so you might have that content depending on your settings, but it wouldn’t be shared with others (client feature).
I strongly agree that purely centralized moderation is bad, but some level of centralization of moderation is beneficial.
Perhaps. I just have trouble figuring out how to decide who the moderators are in a way that doesn’t lead to the problem of new users flooding a community and kicking out existing users, so elections are out. There are no admins to step in to mediate disputes or recover from a hostile takeover.
So my solution leans on the users to generally prefer to not associate w/ scammers, spammers, pedophiles, etc, and that disassociation would help them benefit from the moderation efforts of their peers that think similarly to them. However, this also means that Nazis, pedophiles, etc can use the platform to find like-minded people. But the only people impacted by their nonsense should be those who believe similarly to them, since other users wouldn’t see their content.
So we’ll still end up with silos, but they’ll be silos that users choose. If they don’t like what they’re seeing, they have the tools to fix that. Hopefully this is good enough that most people will get what they want, and in a way with user-driven censorship instead of platform-driven censorship.
The nice thing about this setup is that we can add centralized moderation if we choose in the form of public filter lists. It would be completely opt-in, and clients could be tuned for that use-case. But because of its distributed nature, there’s no protection at the protocol level to prevent undesirable people from forking the client and removing those types of filters, in much the same way that Lemmy doesn’t prevent someone from ignoring all moderation.
I’m open to suggestions. I also don’t like the idea of Nazis and child abusers using my platform, but the distributed nature means nobody has any form of top-down control. Either we elect a moderator (which is subject to bots and whatnot), or we remove the concept of moderator entirely.
I think we’ll end up with accounts that people can trust completely, such as bots that identify CP, gore, extremism, etc, and then you can just explicitly add them to your trusted moderator list. And I’ll probably add something like that to the codebase once it’s created. But yeah, it’s a tricky problem to solve, and I’m trying to lean on reduced centralization when I have to make a choice.
how is pixel with graphene os ?
Good?
By default, there’s no Google Play Services or any Google apps whatsoever. What you do have is a handful of utilities and a minimal app store that gives you the option to install Google Play Services and a few other apps. Or you can use the browser (Vanadium, a Chromium fork w/ some security options enabled) to download an alternative app store (F-Droid, Aurora, etc). They recently added Accrescent to the built-in app store as well, and I see 12 apps in that app store. I think by default there are 6 apps installed? (Messaging, PDF Viewer, Vanadium, Info, Auditor, and the App Store). I can’t remember which I had to install manually since I set it up a few months ago.
So yes, I think they thoroughly remove Google’s stuff from the default install.
Most Android apps seem to work (i.e. installed through Aurora), though a few have issues without Google Play Services running or one of the security features. I use a separate profile for the apps I need that don’t work w/o Google Play services, and I switch profiles as needed. That way I don’t have Google Play Services running at all unless I actually need it.
I hope so, and I hope they make it compatible with regular Linux, like postmarketOS or Mobian. Make sure all the core phone features work properly (calls, SMS/MMS, data, audio, sensors, etc), then let the Linux community go nuts on it.
I’d pay a premium for that, and I’d probably pick up a Framework laptop as well. I currently use an old Thinkpad (circa 2018), and I’m trying to make that last until Framework has an option for a 13-14" laptop with insane battery life (ARM or RISC-V is probably fine), or at least has a keyboard that has a Trackpoint and physical mouse buttons like my Thinkpad. But if they make a phone, I might just lower my standards a bit to keep everything in the family.
GrapheneOS doesn’t have AI crap.
If it’s sustainable.