• Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    they tried something similar(not so similar) with scarlett johansan, where they tried to sneakingly use the streaming income to avoid paying her what she was owed on her contract.

  • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I sort of find it funny and sad that some people expect another person to do the same work (or similar) for half the salary. While most of us would not do that if it wasn’t needed. Sure, he’s rich but money is money.

    Would you do the same work you’re currently doing for half the salary when you know, you can get the same or better salary elsewhere? I don’t think so.

    Renner went on to suggest that the proposed lower salary was a result of his near-fatal 2023

    Though his take on this is… well, odd.

    “This is not Marvel, mind you. This is like, just Disney, not even really Disney. It’s just the penny pinchers, the accountants. I told them to go fly a kite. I mean, just at the at the insult offer. So we didn’t see eye to eye on it,”

    It’s sad that he became arrogant. He could’ve just let it at “no, I will not do it”.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t know about the specific of the deal or what S2 will actually contain, but as I understand S1 set up a new Hawkeye so maybe S2 would’ve had Renner not as the main character and possibly not doing the same amount of work. If he is going to do less work it would make sense to also pay less. This of course is speculation as we don’t know actually know what S2 would’ve been about or what deal was presented to Renner. All we know is Renners side where he claims it would’ve been the same amount of work and I don’t think I need to explain how that can’t be taken as the absolute truth. The rest of what he said really makes me question if he’s being completely honest or is he skewing the story to make himself look like the good guy.

      But if he is telling the truth it would be pretty fucked up to offer half the salary for the same amount of work.

      • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Many people are ignoring another part of the formula. Actors draw views. Renner is the main interest I have in Hawkeye. Kate Bishop is a fine character, but personally Renner is why I watched season 1. Charlie Cox and Vincent D’nofrio are the reason I watched the new Daredevil series.

        Renner might be blowing it out of proportion, but the reality is without his involvement I’m probably going to skip it.

        I’ll give each character a chance to stand on their own but I’m not personally interested in Kate Bishop as a story driver.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I get that his name draws views but I don’t think that’s a factor going from S1 to S2. It’s not like he went from nobody to somebody. He was already popular prior to S1, he didn’t get more popular between seasons. His S1 salary probably already accounted for his popularity so it was most likely also accounted in the S2 salary. But, if he thinks he should’ve been paid more because of his name recognition then that’s him pretty much trying to do the same thing he’s blaming the accountants for, he would be trying to squeeze out every penny from his popularity.

          • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            So in your estimation, you don’t think he should be upset that Disney, one of the biggest organizations in the world, is refusing to pay him what he believes is value to be?

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Kinda? He’s free to ask whatever price the believes he is worth, I don’t have an issue with that. But just like he’s free to ask whatever price he thinks is fair it’s also fair for the other side to just say “No, thanks”. No reason to be upset about it. Or do you think I should side with someone in the top 1% simply because one of the biggest corporations in the world told them no? It’s someone with “set for life” money complaining that the corporation with essentially infinite funds didn’t want to give him as much money as he demanded. I think siding with either side (based on the information we know so far) is stupid.

              • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I mean. I’m not siding with Renner, here. I initially pointed out an observation I didn’t see anybody making.

                I replied to you specifically because it seemed to me you were discounting Renners contribution to the success of the first season. I do think it’s fine for him to be publicly pissed about this, if what he’s saying is true. I don’t know either way but if he left those meetings feeling that way, there may be a reason and there’s no reason to assume he’s just a rich guy being a rich asshole.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If i made millions doing very little work in a job that simmers down slowly, because all i peoduce is slob that no one cares for. Yes, i might take a paycut.

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh no… rich person gets offered to be paid millions instead of being paid millions…

    • eskimofry@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      On the other hand there’s its always good to fight for an artist when the opponent is Disney.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I never understand this mindset. It reminds me of people who complain about NFL players all while the owners rake in billions. Like why y’all mad at the labor? Be mad at the owner.

        • eskimofry@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          You only dislike the labor because they make a lot of money. But in practice they are in a similar situation to yourself or any other worker. (unless you don’t work, then forgive me)

          I don’t think you will appreciate it if your employer suddenly decided to pay you half your wage out of the blue. And any kind of reduction of workload offered is usually a false promise… would you keep quiet?

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I understand your point, milk the corpos for all you can. But they aren’t exactly philanthropists anyway, they take their private jets, hoard their wealth etc.

            Renner even had an app to take more money off fans, so fuck him. I can judge each one individually. Some are just blinded by the fame and fortune, so they are not much better than the shareholders anyway.

      • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Respect has a price huh? Also there are no details why he got paid more. Does he olny appear half the time? Is he just a cameo? No surley he’s just a poor multi millionaire with his own social media app

        • eskimofry@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          When was the last time your employer told you in your interview that your job was going to be X and Y responsibility only, and it was actually true throughout the job? it’s difficult to trust your boss not to overload you after cutting your pay.

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe they’re speculating only half the people will watch it, based on previous trends. I sure didn’t watch the first one.

  • DearMoogle@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Good for him, and he’s just asking for his original salary. Pay this man!👏👏👏 Isn’t Hawkeye supposed to be one of the better Marvel Disney+ shows anyway? Watch them come crawling back

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I was never a fan of his, but when I saw this I decided he’s just not a good person. What a gross thing to do to people who support you. I hope to not have to see him in anything going forward.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Idk man.

        I went to the Wiki article, and it’s formatted in a way that basically implies he did the app himself.

        Renner explained the shutdown in a goodbye post. “Due to clever individuals that were able to manipulate ways to impersonate me and others within the app, I have asked ESCAPEX, the company that runs this app, to shut it down immediately and refund anyone who has purchased any stars over the last 90 days,” he wrote. Stars are the app’s version of currency. “What was supposed to be a place for fans to connect with each other has turned into a place that is everything I detest and can’t or won’t condone.”

        So it’s some company called ESCAPEX. I could put money, but not a lot of it, on them having sold Renner the concept instead of the other way around. Artists always have tons of passive income from things like that, and it seems like it ran pretty smoothly for a few years, until the trolls, and when he found out, he shut it down.

        Idk maybe it was his idea and he only shut it down when it became completely uncontrollable idk.

        But I don’t know, and definitely haven’t seen enough evidence to say he’s a bad person.

        Edit yeah

        One of the main controversies of Renner’s app was its marketing. The app’s developers, Escapex, specialized in and grew famous for making similar monetized apps for celebrities.[13][8] The marketing campaign was based on direct contact with Renner, whose chances were increased with regular payments for “stars”,[17] although very few encounters seemed to happen with Renner himself.[18] The multiple problems with the app led the CEO of Escapex, Sephi Shapira, to call the app a “freak situation”, and added “Am I concerned about this? Not more than I’m concerned about 50 other things I’m dealing with as a startup company.”[17] Along with the marketing failures, the app was seen as misrepresenting itself as seemingly erotic with some advertisements featuring Renner suggestively staring at the camera, despite the actual app being initially considered safe for children.[14]

        I think is more a case of Renner being taken advantage of by some asshole company than him straight up being an asshole

      • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        It’s basically an onlyfans/patreon that he didn’t have to give someone else a cut of…

        If people want to give you money, let them…

  • nop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    His ‘joke’ about a ‘fictional character’ being a slut tells me all I need to know about him. He is insufferable and everything I have seen him in was made worse by his presence.