Was looking for pharmacy hours. Need my meds today.

“AI overview” showed me it was open til 10pm. I squinted and looked at the correct results below: open until 7pm.

Going to gets my meds now before it closes.

Fuck AI.

  • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Search has literally gotten so much worse since they forced AI into it. Can I please have 2020 google back? Hell even earlier likely.

    Tip: Adding “before:2022” in your image searches will avoid a lot of AI slop.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’ve had both DDG(Bing) and Google give me “no results found” for a query I know with 100% certainty worked a few years ago.

      Started with a few words in a row in quotation marks, and it just goes nope. Then you add a bunch of related keywords and suddenly it can find it just fine. And will even highlight the phrase you had in quotation marks, the one it claimed had zero results. Because it no longer uses your words to actually search through web page contents, it puts your query into an LLM and uses that to filter and lookup things.

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is my exact assumption. It use to be very useful to use quotes for finding very specific things like file names. Now it’s just garbage and returns no results when the LLM spits out garbage.

        I just can’t understand why it doesn’t fallback to old behavior.

        Seems like they actually have lost their old infrastructure by implementing LLM stuff. They literally went backwards in terms of search.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because it no longer uses your words to actually search through web page contents, it puts your query into an LLM and uses that to filter and lookup things.

        Oh, hell no. Does anyone have a list of which search engines do that? Or alternatively, a list of search engines that explicitly don’t?

        Because I don’t even know where to search to find this kind of information anymore.

    • jonjuan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Another things that sucks with search engines these days:

      Try searching for information on a subject that has been in the news recently (not info about news event), and all you get is current blogs and news articles from today and yesterday…

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah. Sadly Twitter is still the best place to get breaking news. As long as you follow respectable journalist.

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Isn’t it fun, to not know if information you are given is anywhere from correct to completely wrong randomly.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was just watching a YT video and they were using screen caps of Google AI search results to explain something and I just immediately closed it. Fucking morons.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Seems universal that pharmacies are open until 7 with a closure from 1:30 to 2 for lunch. 6 PM on Sundays.

    I’m not even on CVS and mine runs the same hours.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      If they ran enough people they could stagger lunch hours and not have to close for that 30 mins (which is ridiculous for a lunch break, even if you brought something). But we’re talking about stores that have made having maybe two on the floor stocking with one running to the register when needed, and only a few in the pharmacy to handle lines inside and the drive-thru.

      And it’s considered the norm now in the US. Because what is your option for the medical part? They’re all the same, they’ve made most family owned stores close, and often your insurance through your employer (another racket itself) requires you go to a particular brand. The only real choice you have is which store if you’re in an urban area. Sometimes driving a few more miles to the next one means you find stuff in stock and you get waited on faster.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        From what I’ve seen, it’s not a problem with the pharmacy techs, it’s the pharmacist proper. If the pharmacist is out, then the techs can’t deliver the drugs because of consultations.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          This is the reason 100%. The Pharmacist and consultations is what matters. Pharmacies rarely hire to have more than 1 pharmacist on at any given time. Just like many stores only have 1 manager on at a time.

          Hell, in some areas where legal, CVS and the like have been trying to switch to remote pharmacists via video calls to not even have to hire for each location! Just taking absolute minimum staffing to the next level to optimize profits even more. You thought it was bad not having an extra employee to cover call outs and vacation? Now it’s being constantly understaffed to optimize profit.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Right, so to close for any time implies there’s only one pharmacist on duty. I don’t even mind having a down time for lunch really, it’s just that it’s too short to be realistic, and it’s solely to minimize the labor, which is always the first thing to squeeze.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Our Rite Aid is open 8am to 9pm with a 30 min lunch. Too bad the store part looks like it belongs in the Fallout series.

      Still, I’m never going back to CVS.

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You can click the little link icons to see where it got its misinformation.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve had similar results just from whatever system Google uses to track store hours. It gets out of date or something and has become useless to me because I can’t rely on it.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    while you’re at it, switch to a search engine that lets you completely and permanently disable AI bullshit so it never even shows up again

    • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      My typical search engine is really bad at showing hours for local businesses.

      I only use this search because it usually shows accurate hours. …which is now apparently a “sometimes”–thing.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Same happened for us and a local store. It said they were open on Easter, but were not.

    Google maps has been acting fucky as well. Is it getting poisoned by AI?

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup. It’s complete nonsense garbage. AI results mean you now need to research those answers when it’s just better to ignore/disable it and use your own logic and searching skills.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    ai is great for spitting your own thoughts back at you but not for gaining nrw information

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hey, remember when you had to call or go look on the door to find out when businesses close?

    Good times.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If we’re all in agreement about AI being problematic, wouldn’t it make much more sense to unite us against it, than to divide us over the reasons why we don’t like it? You could have simply said, “You know what else sucks about AI?” then listed your additional reasons.

      There will always be people out there who don’t know things that you know. When you ditch the insults and approach knowledge gaps as opportunities to educate, you’ll get a lot more people on your side.

      I say this as a supporter, a teammate, a fellow angry autist that sees many diverse reasons to be against the widespread use of AI. You make good points that I haven’t seen raised here before, but I’m disheartened that you chose to present it in such a hostile, divisive way. In-fighting only hurts our side; it makes more sense to aim our anger at the target we can all agree on - AI itself.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        No

        I will not lend my effort to pursuing stupid and meaningless goals when it is literally our free will and self-governance that’s on the fucking line

        No one here really understands how quickly it will get so very, very bad.

        There are so many reasons the AI art debacle is a non-issue and no one here will ever take the time to listen why. You are all just screaming about the color of the grass when a fucking tsunami is cresting the shore RIGHT THE FUCK NOW

    • Lauchmelder@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago
      1. not all of us are american
      2. your entire browsing history was already being tracked before AI was a thing

      complaining about AI being (sometimes dangerously) wrong is valid. we don’t need more technology polluting the internet with misinformation

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not about being tracked, it’s about how AI can take five hundred million different tracks, identify the 10,000 most vulnerable, identify which of those are the same person on different accounts and then custom create radicalization campaigns for every motherfucking one of them more compelling than anything you could meme, and then direct blast it at them. And it can do this over and over and over again, nonstop

        Welcome to the bleak hell of the future internet where 98% of your engagements are bots that want to take your money or make you fight for them

        And that’s not even talking about how authoritarian regimes will use it to target dissidents from anonymized data.

        I wonder how many will have to die before all of you shut the fuck up about the furry art theft bullshit

        • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Using autism as a shield to be a raging asshole on every possible subject. Might as well drop the autistic part because all that’s doing is giving a bad name to other autistic people who aren’t intentionally and furiously assholes to everyone. Why even comment if you’re gonna be wrong and bitchy about everything? Sounds like you wake up and piss in your own cornflakes my dude