and the only place where they dont ask for exorbitant amounts of money in exchange for self improvement.

IT crowd 100%

The funny thing is news sites are barely, if not at all, talking about the only two female scientists on board. If you don’t know their names, you will not even be able to find it in most articles because all they care about are Katy Perry and Laurent Sanchez. lol truly a historic victory for the common female

is this supposed to show people everything is alright, there is no sexism and misogyny? wow billionaires are really so out of touch with reality

“We will have AI agents that run the network with no manual intervention.”

Sounds hard to believe.

billionaires are a systematic risk to the tech industry.

FFY

Oh shit had already forgotten about this amid so many other scandals. The guy who said this is running the whole of US like a fucking medieval kingdom, another reality slap in the face. At that time I was like, “surely no one right in the mind would vote for this scammer”.

I unfortunately don’t can someone explain?

I think one needs to include parameters like how soon after the topic was created the comment was made and how deep is it in the comment tree. If you for instance consistently comment on 1 month old topics or reply on comments ten levels deep you will get very few interactions.

NOOOOOO ITS DOING NUCLEAR PHYSICS!!!111

keep giving the man crazy ideas, this is the way

Unfortunately dealing with these people in a way that respects the law would not get anywhere. By then these people will be likely very rich and law has a bias towards under punishing (relatively) the rich.

good point I try to initialize None collections to empty collections in the beginning but not always guaranteed and len would catch it

Yea I just finished the chapter before going to BG, having a blast

and here I am replaying BGI

this screenshot looks more like the beginning of something else. I wonder where they trained their AI model on hmm…

no conflict of interest, none at all

It is not “assume” as in a conscious “this is probably a bool I will assume so” but more like a slip of attention by someone who is more used to the bool context of not. Is “not integer” or “not list” really that commonly used that it is even comparable to its usage in bool context?

If there is an alternative through which I can achieve the same intended effect and is a bit more safer (because it will verify that it has len implemented) I would prefer that to commenting. Also if I have to comment every len use of not that sounds quite redundant as len checks are very common

I feel like that only serves the purpose up to the point that methods are not over reaching otherwise then it turns into remembering what a method does for a bunch of unrelated objects.