Basically just the title, delete this if it’s not the right community.

I hate iphones and apple stuff for obvious reasons. But I am forced to use it to some degree. I just want to get a community consensus on any problems with signal being shared, seen, monitored, or sent to apple servers or icloud while being used on an iphone.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    depends on your threat model.

    want to hide from advertising and general automated corpo creepness? sure. a reasonably hardened iphone will mostly do the trick.

    want to hide from governments, three letter agencies or similar baddies who could simply order apple to give you the info? fuck no. apple unilaterally controls all the code that runs on it, and is itself subject to them.

    theres the fact signal uses your phone number too…

  • Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It is always the same issues in fact. You should consider your threat model before all. Then, consider the Signal app, then your iPhone supposed to be updated, trusted, with ADP enabled, biometric lock with erasure after 10 failures, etc. Then consider your ISP, then your country. Etc, etc. You should also compare the contexts. Is an iPhone “better” than a low or middle ranges Android-powered smartphones? For sure, yes. Is it better than high-range expansive smartphones with Android ? Or Pixel ones? Not that sure. And compared to GrapheneOS or /e/? Pretty sure not that much. You can also compare messaging solutions. Is Signal better than WhatApp? Of course yes. But what about XMPP and Matrix for example?

    And what are your use cases? Remember your threat model. If you are an activist, a journalist or a whistleblower your needs may be different than a “commons citizen worried about its privacy.

    In few words, the only pain point I see is the fact than iOS is proprietary and runs non libre source code and Apple devices than APN. But Android devices are not so much different. It does not mean the solution is not private or efficient, if we succeed in defining a definition of “private or efficient”.

    In a nutshell, it could be considered as good. But not perfect.

  • stupid_asshole69 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I clicked the little rainbow star to see what people not federated with my instance are saying.

    You’re getting a ton of bad input and inaccurate or irrelevant information.

    Do not rely on community consensus to establish proper use guidelines.

    As another person stated: signal chats don’t go to icloud. You have nothing in the slightest to worry about on that front.

    People are bringing up prism and push notifications. It is mandatory for companies operating in the us to comply with us government prism spying requirements. Turn on ADP. Read past the slide presented as supposedly damning evidence against one or another company if you want to understand better law enforcements processes over a decade ago. Push notifications are plaintext and represent cause in some cases. This is not unique to apple. If you think you are one of those people, turn them off.

    Turn on lockdown mode. Update your phone. Turn on automatic updates. The ways people physically and remotely compromise ios are often stopped by those three things.

    If you don’t already, restart your phone daily. It puts the phone in a restricted state called before first unlock that requires that non resident programs have to reload and in almost all cases have to reestablish themselves to the host os.

    If you’re worried about your signal chats getting recorded, turn on the disappearing feature. The other person is the weakest link, not the technology. Do contact verification. Assume your chats are infiltrated and talk to people about illegal stuff in person like the scions of American industry do. This is not unique to apple.

    Be safe out there.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Wouldn’t it be possible for Apple to have built in keyboard logger and file scanner? No matter how safe the app, the phone can be compromised from the start.

      • stupid_asshole69 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think that argument made in a vacuum, devoid of any analysis about the companies, software and their history could apply equally to any phone (including graphene and fdroid and calyx and postmarket and etc).

        So it’s not useful to bring up when someone is asking about specifically ios, since it’s a hypothetical problem that applies equally to all phones and their software and the solution to it is putting the onus on the user to audit their software, operating systems, microcode, hardware and everything else or to determine whose audit of those systems to trust.

        I think it’s especially not worth considering under a material analysis of the interests of the company that makes rich people phones and advertises their system as secure and private and generally has longer time to exploit for the different law enforcement processes and provides bare minimum compliance and isn’t primarily selling user data.

        On some level we have to acknowledge the tremendous logical leap required to compare apple and pretty much any other major manufacturer and say “they could have backdoored it and they could be listening right now”. Yeah, I guess they could have done that. They have less incentive and more to lose than any other company and it would take a massive internal conspiracy, but I guess it’s possible.

        I want to just take a line or two and make it clear that I’m basing all the above on the material circumstances of the company, not on any misplaced love for them or their products. I have android, ios, windows, linux and macos computers and use them equally.

  • blackwall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Surprised no one else has chimed in with this yet - but what is your threat model? Are you conducting terrorist activities? Good luck. Are you wanting private messaging between you and your friends - it’s probably fine - definitely better than texting. I will temper this with just keep in mind anything you send to someone could be screenshot, their partner could see it etc. You need to figure out who your potential adversary is before deciding if a communication channel is “safe”. First ask yourself “safe from what?”.

  • Gina@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Theoretically: fuck no. Private operating system, not open source code, installation source is Apple itself, Apple helps law enforcement, Prism scooped up all unencrypted data.

    Practically: signal wouldn’t keep developing an iOS app if there was hard evidence Apple couldn’t be trusted, Apple gives plenty of options for your data to not be collected in plain text and given to law enforcement (turn off iCloud backups, turn off biometrics, lockdown mode, advanced data protection) but not default because they’re trying to balance being a luxury product with compliance, as a luxury product it’s used by rich people and rich people love their privacy (citation needed), Apple is the only practical choice if you don’t get a google pixel, FBI is always fighting them on allowing full phone encryption, they rolled out a contact encryption key verification feature for their own iMessage.

    Signal explicitly doesn’t allow its files to be uploaded to iCloud. You practically will be fine using it on iOS. Unless you are in China which has its own iCloud/Apple servers, or the UK where Apple disabled advanced data protection.

    Apple provides encryption for its customers, but not by default. All its encryption features hint to me that they would prefer not having anything to hand over to the hundreds of law enforcement agency’s around the planet, but don’t want to piss them off by making it default. This aligns with it being a hardware and service company, vs the advertising company Google.

    Privacyguides has a page on steps you can take in your iPhone to harden it.

    You are in a better situation than most. Make plans to get onto a graphene pixel. But if that wasn’t available then an iPhone is the next best choice.

    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Signal explicitly doesn’t allow its files to be uploaded to iCloud. You practically will be fine using it on iOS. Unless you are in China which has its own iCloud/Apple servers, or the UK where Apple disabled advanced data protection.

      What difference does ADP make if your Signal chats are never stored in iCloud? Are they stored in cloud backups?

      • Gina@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You’re correct, it doesn’t make a difference in regards to signal.

        I meant it more as a general iPhone use. Your iPhone with ADP off is uploading everything to Apple iCloud unencrypted. By default only your passwords & health app data is encrypted.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Terms like “safe” and “private” are not binary.

    Are the contents of your Signal conversations on an iPhone private with regard to mass surveillance conducted by governments and ISPs? Probably. Apple uses security and privacy as marketing points, and there are a whole lot of people looking for vulnerabilities in its products who are incentivized to disclose them (possibly with a delay for patches). Signal itself takes steps to prevent data leaks to less secure parts of the OS and other apps.

    Would your conversations remain private in the face of a targeted attack against your device by a nation state willing to spend a significant amount of time and money when you’re using Signal on an iPhone that’s presumably used for purposes other than secure conversations with a small set of people you know? Almost certainly not.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      And signal, considering its a centralized US company that has your phone number.

  • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s a lot of reasons why I think Signal on an iPhone may not be as private as on a FOSS Android ROM.

    First thing is that you are probably getting your notifications from an Apple server. While Apple cannot see the message content, it os possible that they are still collecting some metadata, as when is the user receiving messages, etc.

    Second, the usage of keyboard. I cannot prove that Apple is keylogging your every keyboard stroke, but I don’t think anyone can disprove it either. On Android, we always ask users to use a FOSS keyboard, as some keyboard apps look at the screen and read messages to “provide better text prediction”.

    Last is app usage metadata. Apple is still storing all the information about how many times you unlock the phone and how much you use Signal, how many times you open the app in a day, when and (maybe even) why you open the app. Which photos you are sharing through your photos app with Signal, such information is also valuable.

    I would say most of your conversations are private, as Signal’s developers are very knowledgeable and they know what they are doing.

    But if you have a skeptical mind like I do, or even like most people here do, I would not trust them a bit because of their proprietary code. You cannot be completely sure what they are doing. You just have to trust Apple, which most of here don’t.

  • midtsveen [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Honestly, Signal itself is secure, but iOS? Forget iOS. Why do people cling to a closed-source operating system? Get a Pixel and flash #GrapheneOS or something!

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    iOS fails to include a libre software license text file, like AGPL. We do not control it, anti-libre software.

  • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s only as safe as Apple, which is to say you can’t trust them. If you have AI enabled it’ll be scanning everything (to include signal) to learn your habits and assist you “better”.

    • vf2000@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What should a screenshot that is about 12 years old prove or not prove? Technology has advanced significantly since then. Over the past decade, we’ve developed a range of new encryption algorithms, improved password hashing methods, TLS 1.3, post-quantum cryptography, and much more. The “Game of Trust” can be extended indefinitely, but using a 12-year-old screenshot as evidence for a situation in 2025 is questionable.

  • PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    iPhone isn’t safe

    I cannot wait to get rid of mine

    It is a listening device for the oligarch class

    It is their property even tho you paid for it.

    Tim Cook is instrumental in the fascist encroachment in our lives.

  • Viri4thus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, Apple bent the knee for concessions on tarifs. If you live in the US the chance your comms are backdoored on iOs is 100%.