snooggums

No rush, I assume they are dead.

But it sounds like she want to lettuce say whatever we want!

The big thing here is that ‘polite’ words are being singled out as extraneous when there are tons of extraneous words being used. The focus is on words that make it seem like AI has feelings or intent.

There is no reason to filter any words, because the entire point of LLMs is to take inefficient human communication and do stuff with it. ‘Please’ isn’t any more of a waste that ‘the’ or including a period at the end of a sentence.

Not to mention the fact that the whole thing is so horribly inefficient that ‘extra’ words cost millions of dollars to process. Holy shit that is terrible design.

No, we should not.

So any of the users will be able to freely tell her to kill herself?

Smoking was known to be bad for your health long before anyone did studies because it was easily correlated with coughing and other breathing issues and early death. The evidence was obvious and apparent.

You have been tagged as weak willed and fit for the worst types of labor because robots don’t have feelings.

Maybe don’t write an article speculating about something possible being true based on another article that is also speculating about something being possible when it being able to confirm it is possible. Like speculating about dinosaurs makes sense as we don’t have a way to verify their soft tissues. But when it comes to AI, there are ways to actually confirm the reliability of responses.

I’m smart enough to know that an article peppered with assumption and zero facts is dogshit.

Presumably

might

could

Doesn’t matter how educated someone is when they write a bunch of words about possibilities with no actual evidence. They are morons because they are spouting a bunch of useless speculation about a shitty and unreliable technology and naval gazing about whether ‘being polite’ to a bullshit generator is beneficial. I feel dumber for having read both the article and the linked article.

It FEEEEEEEEEEEELS better is what the authors said too. Both articles were completely worthless dreck about how they felt about the responses.

Both authors state that the phrasing from the AI is what is improved based on how they felt about the answers, not the accuracy.

I hate reality shows but would totally watch one season of that.

The author and the writer they quoted are fucking morons.

Tim Discord

Yeah, I have no issues with slacks, relaxed fit jeans, any shorts, etc. I do have one pair of not very loose jeans that my phone barely fits into, but it still does.

Phone is the largest sized galaxy and I’m pretty much the average US male size.

We already know they knowingly lied about battery range, the capabilities of self driving, and a ton of other fraudulent practices. Tesla is doing it intentionally is more likely than poor build quality.

That is clearly not seafood!

No, treating them as reasonable people is the reason they took power. They cannot be reasoned with as proven by decades of them hardening their views while they were treated as “reasonable people with differing views”.

No, I won’t cater to the idea that pointing out problems makes them worse.

The whole movie was fun, but that scene was memorable because it was so well done.

Wolf Cop has entered the chat