What you’ve described is not an algorithm.
What you’ve described is not an algorithm.
it’s closer to a serious article than a blogpost
I find it bizarre and plain wrong to imply that blog posts can’t be serious articles.
both of which have a major flaw
What major flaw do you believe ActivityPub has?
looks better
What do you mean?
than ActivityPub
ActivityPub is decentralised. AT has a centralised index. They’re not comparable.
becomes an official government mouthpiece
Uh… “becomes”?
You didn’t help me, you wasted my time. Pro-tip: be quiet.
deleted by creator
Uhh… this analysis makes no sense at all. And now OP has admitted that the joke doesn’t make sense and doesn’t work. Still, just for edification:
Pavlov’s reaction: If something unexpected happens (like bumping into someone), the event might “trigger” a conditioned response — such as Pavlov salivating because he’s used to the bell.
There was no conditioned response.
The wordplay is clever because “paradox” not only describes Schrödinger’s cat but also the confusing situation of this fictional encounter.
There was no confusion.
That’s my interpretation of what they were going for.
I’m asking what the joke is. That’s the focus here. Because it’s presented as a joke. Even though it appears not to be. If you get it, please explain it.
Obviously. But what about them?
Being mysterious doesn’t help me I’m afraid. Still don’t get it. The punchline doesn’t make sense and doesn’t ring a bell.
The fact that you haven’t just explained the joke makes me think you can’t because it doesn’t work as a joke. Right?
What’s the idea?
Don’t get it. Suspect it doesn’t actually make sense.
less functionality than a smartphone
Tablet is just a bigger screen
A bigger screen is more functionality.
and how they actually made change
Uh…
the truth is 5 billion light years from you wondering about your existence
What?
Who is yalls go to
O_o
Ask a therapist what kind of therapy they think you should get.
No.