

Amazon who? Never heard of them.
Amazon who? Never heard of them.
A lot of them tend to just be maps of where people live yeah. It’s not informative
Did I say “all cities?”
Like many maps, this is just a map of cities
In addition to allowing Google to manage the authentication process, signing in with Google allows Google to track your visits. In some cases they get additional data about content you view.
In many cases the mere presence of that button allows Google to track that your device visited the Udemy sign in/sign up page, even if you don’t click it. Google uses this to create and update a profile of you they sell for advertising and other purposes, and exposes you to more risk if your Google account is breached. With a password manager I find using SSO to be about the same level of effort as using my manager’s autofill functionality
No fair you’re not allowed to provide context
“We didn’t accept his demands for how we protect member states so he went to war” isn’t the defense you seem to think it is
Any time you end a thought with “so therefore threatening nuclear holocaust is justified” you’re the bad guys.
Hey wake up, either Putin is threatening nuclear holocaust to achieve diplomatic goals or he’s committing nuclear holocaust to achieve diplomatic goals what the fuck are you talking about
The only language worth discussing is brainfuck
Don’t worry this post was written by a first year computer science student who just learned about C. No need to look too closely at it.
Sea of Thieves overall best. Hunt: Showdown a close second
That depends on where you live. Most places in the US, yes it is legal. It’s legal to keep almost any data for any reason in most of the US
Canadian technology? So they politely asked for the private key then
Hmm, perhaps. But…recurring revenue sure is easier than…whatever you said.
Yes but then how do they get that sweet sweet recurring revenue
Has it gotten worse? They’ve been dogshit for a long time, maybe they’ve gotten worse and I haven’t noticed
What about it?
Ok I’m sorry. I mean I’d do it again but I recognize it’s wrong.
But they literally HAVE a fiduciary obligation. I agree with you that people use that as an excuse for heinous shit, but in this case they had a formal, legally binding offer. Musk was in breach of contract and they sued for specific performance or damages. Musk didn’t want to pay the damages. If they didn’t sue, Twitter would forfeit I think $1bn in damages and their stock would tank. Not suing would open the door for hostile investors to come in, pretend to buy, back out when they wanted to and time the stock movements. I get what you’re saying, but this is a case where if the board didn’t sue then Twitters shareholders pay for it.
You and I may agree that they never should have been in that place to begin with but that’s definitionally a fiduciary obligation
Yes but I guess “software works as written” doesn’t go viral as well