It’s not a study, it’s some half assed survey from the 70s or whatever.

The enemy is simultaneously strong and weak.

Assuming laws still matter, of course. It is 2025, after all. We’re in the age of “What are you going to do if I don’t?”

Cat owners generally don’t care.

It’s an interesting idea I don’t necessarily disagree with, but while we’re adding more people to our prison system, what other offenses are eligible?

They know he can’t live forever, right?

I imagine there’s a lot of overlap between how those who feel that about 1/6 feel about the riots you listed.

A certain percentage of any group doesn’t give a fuck about the movement and just likes being assholes.

Either rioters police their own or they will be judged as equal to the worst of them, because that’s all people will be shown on TV.

January 6th.

It’s one of those things that didn’t use to be negative but has been hijacked by shitty people and now has negative connotations depending on context.

Boo!

So’s your mom.

0

I never understood order of operations in school. Did I do it right?

Le gem!

Literally this right here.

“I don’t doubt you’re good with technology, but I doubt you’re good with technology.”

Why does she show up as LibLeft on political compasses if she’s so Reagan?

I’m starting to think that proposal may not have been modest after all.

Spammy?

Then just stop responding to them.

Your reasoning matches with some of the most hostile people out there because they have alarms that are very easy to trip. So virtually everyone “shows them there’s no reason to be” kind.

For example, someone disagrees with you? They must be far too stupid to understand what you’re writing or intentionally missing the point just to attack you, so there’s no reason to be kind to them.

I had a match last week, as a free account who’s never had premium.