What does the undergrowth of an oak hickory Forest look like? People can plant the trees, but how do you get the undergrowth?

This was 19 September to 11 October 1957

Would not recommend, it’ll regurgitate what you want to hear.

https://slrpnk.net/post/20991559

AI companies are looking at nuclear, so we might get a check on the top right box soon.

Three Mile Island is reopening and selling its power to Microsoft

This one was a juvenile though, 12" long.

That’s why they can’t afford it, not enough left over for them!

Then I guess it’s stock dividends?

I mean, he used to look like this

Plus, inhaling graphite dust since it doesn’t fall doesn’t sound fun.

Is this showing 4k77?

Edit: no, looks like they’re showing the technicolor film directly from the BFI National Archive. Similar to the one 4k77 was scanned from.

They stay coherent for that long? My dreams can’t keep a story line going, always running down rabbit holes.

It’s only the same if it’s up 10% compared to the original number. It all depends on your time period, you could be up 30% compared to 7 years ago.

You comparing additional deaths per year per capita or what?

For general stuff, yeah, but there’s a lot of discussion that still isn’t happening anywhere else.

Duck duck go doesn’t seem to have recent Reddit results. And I’m not paying a monthly subscription. Seems like most others use Google’s indexing. You have a suggestion for a free non Google based search engine that indexs Reddit?

Fewer than 232 journalists were killed in WWI and WWII? 50 to 57 million civilians were killed in WWII, were fewer than 200 of them journalists? I can’t find the total number of journalists in 1940, but with that number you could estimate the percentage of the population and multiply by 50M.

I was expecting projectile vomit to fling everywhere.

To extend the metaphor, it would be like discussing cold fusion with a fellow chemistry enthusiast. They imply that it works, and was shut down by political motives, but that it’s been discussed to death professionally, so no use discussing it further. I agree that it has been discussed to death, but their conclusion is opposite of the conclusion I have found online, so I would push for further support.

The answers I easily got online were opposite of what you were saying, hence my persistence.

But neither of us are political scientists. We’re both backyard chemistry enthusiasts in this metaphor. So when you claim something that doesn’t make sense with my cursory knowledge and searches, I ask you to back it up.

I did reread the thread. My summary still stands. Could you summarize your understanding of it?