because LLMs are great at pattern recognition. people have been pumping out formulaic low effort art for so long that it was easy for an AI to mimic it. good art is not common, but bad art is. so you can imagine which one has significantly more training data.
yea but all modern image generators work in conjunction with LLMs. this is why most of them will transform your prompt into something else. theyre all trained on data in order to recognize patterns. but i appreciate the “akshually” with absolutely no useful information added.
CLIP isn’t an llm either. point being, the pattern recognition argument doesn’t hold. they’re feature detectors, which is basically a giant grid of classifiers. that’s not what llms do.
I guess we’re both on a similiar page. i thought you were joking at first when you completely missed what i was saying but then i re-worded it only for you to abstractly strawman it in the most insecure redditor-like way. turns out your reading comprehension gets dangerously close to 0 when someone mentions this specific topic. im sorry you gotta do presumably physical labor for a living but nobody was ever gonna buy your waifu art.
Then why did AI suck it all up and use their work?
because LLMs are great at pattern recognition. people have been pumping out formulaic low effort art for so long that it was easy for an AI to mimic it. good art is not common, but bad art is. so you can imagine which one has significantly more training data.
image generators are not llms.
yea but all modern image generators work in conjunction with LLMs. this is why most of them will transform your prompt into something else. theyre all trained on data in order to recognize patterns. but i appreciate the “akshually” with absolutely no useful information added.
CLIP isn’t an llm either. point being, the pattern recognition argument doesn’t hold. they’re feature detectors, which is basically a giant grid of classifiers. that’s not what llms do.
again with the ‘akshuallys’ its wild that you are flexing your IQ on the topic but youre taking the side of the luddites. unreal, bro.
So you’re saying that AI is built on bad art? Interesting take
no im saying its built on all art, and most art is bad.
So you only think people should make food that you like or it’s bad food. Got it.
you seem like a failed artist to have that much salt…
so let me try again.
what i think of the art is irrelevant, im explaining how it produces results.
if most art was good, there would be a lot more museums.
i think most people would agree good art is exceptional - which means its above average. which means that the majority of art is mediocre at best.
again, my opinion of any particular art does not matter in this explanation so please hold back on the LDE in your reply.
I got the best laugh out of this. Thank you, you made my day. Especially, this part:
Edit: I can’t decide if I want to upvote you or downvote you, I think you actually believe what you’re saying.
I guess we’re both on a similiar page. i thought you were joking at first when you completely missed what i was saying but then i re-worded it only for you to abstractly strawman it in the most insecure redditor-like way. turns out your reading comprehension gets dangerously close to 0 when someone mentions this specific topic. im sorry you gotta do presumably physical labor for a living but nobody was ever gonna buy your waifu art.