Based TekSavvy user

Does the disclaimer on the box say “Not for human consumption” or “Fit for human consumption”?

Careful with all that copium you’re huffing

I like to think that he forgets, keeps trying and then makes a new post about it

The document is filled with so much meaningless fluff that it’s annoying to read and was probably written by chatgpt and the cover image is AI generated: I don’t think there’s anything useful here.

Definitely an abuse of the system, but I’m struggling to see where criminal law says you can’t make a bunch of fake accounts to listen to garbage music.

Literally says “Microsoft” in the top left.

He deserves way more than an apology. The mayor lied about the impact and then got a restraining order granted without David knowing about it or having legal representation. People really think the “dark web” is some secret magical interspace and not just one tor-browser download away.

I think they don’t have a literal national firewall, rather they demanded every single ISP in the country to block the domain.

I think that site has incorrect information. They wrote “you need to sign up separately on every server on Mastodon to see their community posts” but surely that’s the opposite of what the fediverse is about? Mastodon’s server page even says that with a single account you can see everything.

Here’s the link to the actual lawsuit: https://bivens.plaintip.com/index.php/google-incognito/

Sadly, only for Americans.

I’m pretty sure that vulnerability only affected windows machines. Surely you’re not running a homelab with windows server?