What it will mean in practice is that every objective fact has to be balanced with a right wing talking point.

Gosh Tim. How is that million dollar personal contribution directly into Trump’s pocket to Trump’s inauguration fund working out for you?

Trump’s plan for ending the genocide is to let Netanyahu complete it.

I wondered why Samsung, a company that literally produces military weapons, wasn’t on the list.

Probably because South Korea is a close military ally.

“He blew the whistle on a multibillion dollar company - obviously he knew they’d kill him! Suicide.”

I’m sure that’s a much more effective than trying to build up US companies to make solar panels.

“I’ll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.”

No worries. Still interesting!

Ok. Have a nice day.

I have no idea what you are trying to say. Batteries have an environmental impact, but so does fracking for natural gas. You have the impact up front making a battery, but charging it with renewables does not have continued environmental impact. But if you use gas, you’re going to have to use an awful lot of it over that time period to offset the clean power you’re able to use when you have a battery. And that gas has a very high environmental impact, continually, over that entire time period.

I didn’t say batteries have NO impact, but they have less impact than continually mining and burning fossil fuels.

You make the batteries once, and the pollution due to production is spread over the 10-15 year lifetime of the battery. During that time gigawatt hours of clean power sloshes in and out of them. This in contrast to having to produce enough gas to make all of those gigawatt hours once, then throw the gas away as co2 and get more, along with the attendant pollution.