

What is the benefit of fedora and its atomic version, if you use flatpak and distrobox on both installs? Add btrfs snapshots and you can’t brick your system either, which is your point, I guess
What is the benefit of fedora and its atomic version, if you use flatpak and distrobox on both installs? Add btrfs snapshots and you can’t brick your system either, which is your point, I guess
How can you tell that it’s a good shoe? I tried resesrching it but it’s wishy-washy
Why would ffmpeg run faster on another distro?
Some people wear underwear with huge names on them. I don’t understand it. Good for you if it does not bother you.
I’m not liking the idea that my partner sees an ad every time we get intimate
Thanks for mentioning that. I have no idea how to judge a shoe’s quality. I have to do some research
That sounds like those youtubers
People run around with nike logos
And pay for it. People are walking ads
That’s what I don’t understand. Usually you quote the original source. What if it was a video?
The twitter guy didnt share the link to the source
I don’t get why people share twitter screenshot instead of the image itself
I can play this game as well
Nix is great for reproducibility
That’s called snap on ubuntu
Your description does not sound related to git. It sounds more like nix
I used the big ones, ubuntu, arch, opensuse and (atomic) fedora. Fedora had the nicest out of box experience. Morover, I moved to podman, systemd, selinux, etc. And the atomic version showed me a new workflow with flatpak and distrobox (nowadays, I use nix oftentimes).
The best part about it is that I do not care about the system anymore. I do not even interact with it. I don’t install packages (besides the base layer and minimal modifications that are long lasting like installing openssl for GNOME iirc)
I use mainly flatpaks, if I need aur, I fire up distrobox, or use nix if I want to. And the best part is, I’d have the exact same workflow even without the atomic version. Even on another distro. I do not interact with it much.
Moreover, I am happy with all the choices fedora made with the base package and images. I do not have to do an informed choice like on arch. It just updates whenever I boot my pc. I do not need to read updates, they are just there, somewhere. I do not need to disable snaps or work around weird choices. I just start firefox, vscodium, a terminal and do whatever I want to do.
Edit: I actually wanted to switch back to opensuse just to support it but I guess I’d rather move to nix some day. Maybe with niri and cosmic.
Ubuntu […] Delivering A Great Desktop Experience
And then listing changes in gnome.
It does not fork anything. Right now, it uses already existing fedora / oci images.
Besides “hate”, EU wants to support EU based tech.
Suse and fedora are both linux and not that different. Nix would be great as well, especially for admins, I guess.
Nix and suse are european. Support contracts etc go to European firms instead of american.
Understandable.
Advertising for a change needs great effort. I’d rather spend the effort in improving gimp, writing down whats missing and how to get there. Adding suppor for affinity won’t improve gimp, does it?
I’d rather support FOSS software
Why?