It doesn’t even sound like he was the one who released it. He stole to sell them, they don’t say he distributed it online, so probably someone bought it off him and ripped it. What a dumbass

Please actually read the article

The company was originally established by Max Levchin, Peter Thiel, and Luke Nosek in December 1998 as Fieldlink. Later it was renamed Confinity,[9] a company which developed security software for hand-held devices.[10] When it had no success with that business model, it switched its focus to a digital wallet.[11] The first version of the PayPal electronic payments system was launched in 1999.[12]

In March 2000, Confinity merged with X.com, an online financial services company founded in March 1999 by Elon Musk, Harris Fricker, Christopher Payne, and Ed Ho.

Musk founded a company that merged with the company that invented PayPal.

PayPal was not founded by Musk

2. assumes that domestic producers can produce with similar costs as their international competitors, which obviously isn’t the case in most circumstances. In fact, the entire point of tariffs, that are meant to protect domestic industry, is raising domestic competitiveness. If they’d already be equally competitive to international producers, tariffs wouldn’t do much.

“It doesn’t happen to me, so it must not be a real thing”

The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources

So as I understand it, under the OSI definition of the word, anything distributed under a copyleft licence would not be open source.

So all software with GNU GPL, for example.

That’s not a counterargument lmao are you serious?

Holy non-sequitur

Perplexity is really good, I love using it.

Why don’t you answer the question?

deleted by creator

They blocked the TikTok domain in China. What would you call that, if not a ban?

You are naive if you believe they aren’t going to sever the communities. That was always going to happen.

TikTok is banned in China, so why would anyone ever expect this would be different in this case?

I don’t even disagree that it’s a fine headline, but this community shits its pants everytime an article isn’t extremely accurate in it’s headline, so it’s funny to suddenly have an army of people descent upon this comment section to defend specifically this one.

“Some” would be more useful in this instance, as it would distinguish it from the general case. That’s pretty standard behaviour for news headlines too, right? This study does not concern itself with iron age populations in general but specifically celtic communities between 100 BC and 100 AD in Britain.

I never implied that it would mean “every single man”. That’s a pretty strange way to read my comment.

The word “some” at the beginning of the headline would have been a perfectly acceptable qualification of the phrase which also would’ve better described the actual findings of the study.

Calling it now, it’s not gonna happen. And I’ll be back in this threat when dust settles

The only vibe I’m getting is “edgy 15 yo who just learned about politics”

The plural of anecdote is not data

YouTube basically completely stopped recommending me those videos years ago because it learned I never click on them.