

Or just a few Display Ports and HDMI
Or just a few Display Ports and HDMI
It just changes the user agent instead…
LLM is a subset of ML, which is a subset of AI.
Just waiting for an IP lawsuit to happen there
It’s amazing that they get it right 40 % of the time then.
And how does breast feeding work? Is it from the human tit or the horse tit?
I suppose that’s exactly what they should be teaching.
Waterfox
I think people don’t want specialised tools, they want one tool they can always have with them. We can see the decline of computer use (and literacy) as a consequence of this. Many young people don’t use computers much, if at all.
I would definitely call that selling my data. The recipient can now add that to my profile as an interest.
Also, Brave has really shitty features like redirecting referral codes.
Firstly, if they don’t believe in copyright, they shouldn’t be advocating for copyright, i.e. don’t base your whole business model hypocrisy. “Copyright for ther but not for me”.
The second paragraph has a vaguely defined “resources”. I assume you mean that people learning art looks at existing art as a way to get better and produce new art. I don’t think this should be in the same category as copying art from “commons”. I do believe generative AI to be copying rather than learning, unlike humans.
The third paragraph tries to put a class barrier on good morals. Let’s assume that is true. I’d argue that anyone that has the time and money to start their own venture into game development also is quite “comfortable” and should therefore be measured by the same stick.
As to that assumption: Most open source is created by people in their spare time. They mostly have full time jobs to do as well, the collaboration is done for fun or as a calling to do good for the world.
Who are you arguing against? What’s this rant supposed to teach me? You don’t like copyright? Fine, tell me with one sentence - not a wall of text.
Not this again… LLM is a subset of ML which is a subset of AI.
AI is very very broad and all of ML fits into it.
The government is very split on many questions. Privacy being a weird one because it’s the (somewhat) left-leaning Social Democratic that usually come up with these crazy ideas without understanding the implications of privacy.
See Chat Control 2022-2024 https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/chat-control-all-you-need-to-know-about-the-eu-plan-to-scan-all-your-whatsapp-chats
I disagree with all three paragraphs.
It’s a whole business, selling skins and other “resource packs” aimed to kids.