ObliviousEnlightenment

  • 3 Posts
  • 103 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle














  • Thanks for bringing up the bone point. Something noone seems to acknowledge in this argument is that anything that couldnt be changed would come with just as many disadvantages as advantages. Even then, you can make things fair without outright bans. Discuss is co ed but womens are half the weight, an argument they themselves used


  • The issue isnt how to figure out. The issue is you’re suggesting checking people’s bits, which is patently invasive. Also, most leagues that are inclusive have a surgery requirement. The Olympics for example require you be post op for at least two years, and have hormone levels at a cis womans average. Not one trans woman has even podiumed because were less than a percent of the population, and become the subject of a news frenzy if we try


  • Its important for the same reason gays and leabians want proper marriages and not just civil unions. There is social legitamacy that comes from inclusion. I have also never seen a single study actually backing up this unfair advantage narrative.

    Meanwhile, the WNBA has an average player height of 6’1" against the average womans height of 5’4". But noone complains about a cis woman whos 6 foot having an unfair advantage. Meanwhile even cis women get caught in the crossfire, see Imane Khalif who could be executed in her home country for being trans. She’s not, but one salty boxer and a fraudulent Russian report gave her all sorts of shit and put her life in danger.