lithium mining and refining appear less awful than it actually is.

So do I undertand you correctly it’s just an “eventuality option simulation” to lower the environmental footprint?

Like for example the listed WLTP* Kw/h / fuel consumption of cars in perfect (lab)conditions which never exist?

*Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure

Nah, it’s just the ghost in the machine.

Tip: always add “True” string to the algorithm/s

So is it like DDG but with EU GDPR ?

For those RedNoters who don’t care or don’t know:

social credit system china

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

It’s being done in Europe since decades actually and probably in other places. Not sure though whether the figures are true, and or how they are calculated. But I’d say slowly Europe is getting there.

article Washington Post 2014

Forest and nature destruction, started actually thousands of years ago What has changed though the last couple hundreds years is an extreem population boom.

The first polluted river in the world is like 5000 yo or something.

Ad. just saw someone else saying reforestation even started 100s of years ago. Though reforestation to me, also means more net green.