Donate to help volunteer fighters defend Ukraine! https://protectavolunteer.com/

  • 3 Posts
  • 61 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle











  • i only had a few thousands, thankful for tafe here in Australia

    This I can’t relate to

    Online, “You can see someone on a boat. You can see someone skydiving,” says Kara Perez, the financial educator behind the sustainable spending platform Bravely Go. “That leads to these questions of, ‘What am I doing wrong that I can’t afford that?’ Or, ‘You know what, I deserve that. Let me figure out a way to achieve that’ — which usually means, ‘Let me put that on my credit card.’” If you see that the whole world has flocked to Europe, you may not rush to book a ticket, but you may do something small to give yourself an immediate dopamine hit — DoorDashing yourself an Italian dinner, for example, or buying yourself a swimsuit for future Sicilian sunbathing.

    if you’re ordering doordash or uber eats and having trouble with money i don’t know what to say

    uber eats is the epitome of a waste of money





  • ikt@aussie.zonetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldleftist infighting
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I don’t get it, can you explain it more? I’m not talking about the voting system, I’m talking about the culture:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesser_of_two_evils_principle#In_modern_elections

    In 2012, Huffington Post columnist Sanford Jay Rosen stated that refusal to vote for the lesser of two evils became common practice for left-leaning voters in the United States due to their overwhelming disapproval of the United States government’s support for the Vietnam War.[8] Rosen stated: “Beginning with the 1968 presidential election, I often have heard from liberals that they could not vote for the lesser of two evils. Some said they would not vote; some said they would vote for a third-party candidate. That mantra delivered us to Richard Nixon in 1972 until Watergate did him in. And it delivered us to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in 2000 until they were termed out in 2009”.[8]

    She can add it delivered Trump 2024 as well to that list



  • ikt@aussie.zonetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldleftist infighting
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes, it’s possible to have 2 shit candidates you know :P

    In Australia we are frequently voting for the ‘least worst’ candidate, we have mandatory voting so very few of us have this idea in our head that we need to run out and enthusiastically support a candidate, we just vote for the one who we think will do the least damage, in Australia Kamala would have won easily



  • ikt@aussie.zonetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldleftist infighting
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    i agree with you but the guy i was arguing with claimed that kamala strayed too far from left wing values and thats why she didn’t win

    my claim is something more fundamental, she didn’t assure voters that she would do better on the economy than trump

    imo even if she did turn around and become the biggest pro Palestinian, transgender, anarchist, radical communist out there she still wouldn’t have won because the biggest issue to people was the local economy not gaza

    she probably should have just offered everyone a tax cut

    edit: and that trump has pretty much no values or ideals, just donald is #1 and he’s gonna fix everything and everyone else is wrong or stupid