If it’s true, China has energy security for the foreseeable future - as Thorium is usually found along side rare earths, and China has the largest deposits of those. More than anywhere else in the world.

Docking procedure complete!

Might relate to this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0NBsyhApvU

Ducking, as in to duck or reduce height. To reduce the height of the audio levels.

Ducking, as in to duck or reduce height. To reduce the height of the audio levels.

Exports from Germany to the nations it owed exceeded what could be produced by their economy, resulting in hyperinflation. Hence why they needed wheel barrows of money.

This is a historical fact that changed the west’s views on war reparations and resulted in the conclusion that nation building was a requirement of post war efforts (for stabilities sake).

WW1 is regarded as a major cause of WW2. It wasn’t a case of “The Great Depression happened then Germany decided to have a World War”.… No, the poverty hit them particularly hard and whenever there’s an external drain on manufacturing that outstrips the ability of a market to keep up, you always get hyperinflation.

Likewise there are other precedents for this in Zimbabwe’s hyperinflation and Venezuelas:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U7t47toB5E

So no, it’s not “Nazi propaganda”. It’s why rebuilding after war is more prioritized, and why war reparations aren’t as much anymore. We saw how that went in Germany.

“at least twice” says the jokers who have picked an arbitrary human concept of “intelligence” to try to measure.

That’s not science because they don’t have any reasonable or reliable definition of the constraints of what they’re claiming to measure (“intelligence”).

It’s intellectual supremacist bullshit. They always shift the goal posts away from the term intelligence - for the same reason IQ tests measure a relativistic “quotient” of score (relative to others tested) rather than being able to measure anything going by “intelligence”.

“Intelligence” is essentially just a brand they slap on research because they all think they’ve got it in spades.

Lots of circumstances are thankfully different. China’s not in a Civil War. America is limited by geography, where as Germany had lots of choices on who to invade. There’s no external cause for America’s economic woes, where as Germany was having their economy drained by outside forces (eg. France, Britain).

No, this won’t be as bad as WW2. Or rather the decisions are more distributed, so it’s less likely to be.

In fact these days they don’t do a whole lot of anything!

Yeah, and then they convert that to weighted probabilities or a “data space” which they then search during content generation.

Who put Lysenko in a position of power?

Look bud, I don’t have all day to teach you this shit. I’m not your mommy or daddy or the history teacher at the local school, so just stop bothering me with your lack of knowledge about this.

Lysenko was elected in 1945 to the ruling committee of the USSR Academy of Sciences—the top scientific institution in the country—numerous scientists spoke out against him, citing his poor scientific reputation [7]. Over the next several years, Lysenko was criticized numerous times, and there were even steps taken to open an institute of genetics [4]. From 1946-1947, up to 1.5 million people died within the Soviet Union due to famine [18]. Lysenko’s nadir during this period was reached in April of 1947, when he was harshly criticized by Russian chemist Yuri Zhdanov, who highlighted Lysenko’s failures. He pointed out the destructive manner in which Lysenko had demonized geneticists, and argued that monopolies in science inhibit advancement [4]. Zhdanov’s words were particularly dangerous for Lysenko, given that the chemist was from a family with close ties to Stalin (e.g., Zhdanov went on to eventually marry Stalin’s only daughter) and he was a member of the powerful Central Committee of the Communist Party [13].

He was a conman, go look it all up yourself. Learn to google.

I feel you don’t know much about these subjects.

Trofim Lysenko

The downfall of Soviet genetics and agriculture occurred due to the alignment of numerous social, economic, scientific, meteorological, and political factors. No single person can bear complete blame for the events, but a crucial actor in the story was Trofim Lysenko. Lysenko was born to a Ukrainian…

https://www.storybehindthescience.org/lysenkoism

I also think you’re arguing just to argue rather than doing something more useful. As I said earlier, neither Mao or Stalin were aiming for a famine, where as Hitler was most definitely aiming for a mass genocide. So your comparison is full of shit.

Bye.

Past the numbers I told you about.

I’m done here - you’re having a conversation with yourself at this point. I addressed the topic I addressed (the deaths from starvation Lysenkoism caused).

You seem to think I denied those numbers rather than being the person who pasted them to you.

I never said he wasn’t. That number in fact comes from the text I posted. However, he wasn’t “responsible” for causing Holodomor (he directed it once it had already been caused). It’s clear you still don’t know what Lysenkoism is.

He was responsible for directing the hunger politically, not for seeking to, or being the cause of the famine.

I’ll simplify it:

If one person turns a tap on and another directs the water, who is responsible for the fact the tap is on?

I’m saying Lysenko and Lysenkoism (which has little to do with socialist and communist doctrine or schools of thought) is the man who turned the tap on. Stalin, being an authoritarian - chose to direct the water to what suited him politically. But the famine at that point was already happening. You can’t just turn an agricultural disaster off once it sets in.

…yet.

Where’s it say to do that?

Why would correcting one point of fact mean ignoring another? That’s not how truth works.

Two statements can both be true at the same time.

Not directly. The conman Lysenko, originator of Lysenkoism was. Lysenkoism has nothing particularly to do with socialism/communism. Stalin didn’t aim intentionally to create mass starvation in Soviet Russia. Nor did Mao in China, these were issues of understanding science which we taken for granted today but weren’t well understood at the time.

Wikipedia:

Before the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the archival revelations, some historians estimated that the numbers killed by Stalin’s regime were 20 million or higher.[5][6][7] After the Soviet Union dissolved, evidence from the Soviet archives was declassified and researchers were allowed to study it. This contained official records of 799,455 executions (1921–1953),[8][9][10][11][12] around 1.5 to 1.7 million deaths in the Gulag,[13][14][15] some 390,000[16] deaths during the dekulakization forced resettlement, and up to 400,000 deaths of persons deported during the 1940s,[17] with a total of about 3.3 million officially recorded victims in these categories.[18] According to historian Stephen Wheatcroft, approximately 1 million of these deaths were “purposive” while the rest happened through neglect and irresponsibility.[2] The deaths of at least 5.5 to 6.5 million[19] persons in the Soviet famine of 1932–1933 are sometimes included with the victims of the Stalin era.[2][20]

Our discussion was never about the term factuality. You’ve just now raised that term for the first time in this discussion. You said search engine. They are in fact searching and reconstructing data based on a probabilistic data space.

…and there are plenty of examples of search engines being sued for the types of data they’ve explored or digitized.

…also the inference that search engines are “accurate” or don’t serve up misinformation, and manipulated data is foolish.

No, they’re helping their team mate. The one who gives them tax breaks and deregulates the restrictions on what they can do, with data.

They’re on the same side. Ideology is the lie. Class warfare is the truth.