Choosing not to participate in the two choice system is how you get a third choice btw
Choosing not to participate in the two choice system is how you get a third choice btw
How do you get anything done at all??
That’s not really up to them being nice though. If you sell something of value X for a margin of 10%, and the price increases to 1.5X, then the margins must apply to 1.5X.
It’s compounding for each element of the chain, so a 10% tariff would very much increase the price way beyond 10%, without anyone needing to be greedy about it.
Then, if you take greed into account… good luck
“Likely” (it’s already ongoing)
Which is why they mentionned the nasdaq
He wants to wake up with his face still on
They only implemented those in bedrock edition, available in the MS store… I’d rather they add it into Java edition so us Linux gamers can use them, and not tie them exclusively with NVidia
Mojang’s “stealing” started from at least the pistons in 2011, 3 years before the acquisition. Credit was given to the original mod author under “Additional programming”, and they did reuse the actual code from the mod
I don’t think it’s fair to call that stealing, for multiple reason:
Other people in his exact position were called samurai back then, at least that’s what I’ve read around
Or nowadays excessively long nails that don’t let you do anything
I haven’t played since blackflag, and I’ve not regretted it
guess you didn’t have that tune on 9/11
When in history has it not been a problem?
If lemmy did this you’d see forks ripping this out, not to mention anything other than lemmy would not have it, so only a very small subset of the fediverse would be subject to this at all, making it perfectly useless
“Truth” being a valid defense absolutely means that defamation does not encompass true statements, just as self defense acts are not homicides
They’re not restrictions though, anyone can buy a PEGI 18 game, it’s just a recommendation
No, “truth” is a valid defense as established by the Defamation Act of 2013, section 2
Truth
It is a defence to an action for defamation for the defendant to show that the imputation conveyed by the statement complained of is substantially true.
Same thing, defamation means that the one making the claim is unable to back them up with any evidence
Stop infantilizing women.
"Are they consenting adults"is the only question people should be allowed to ask about a couple without being publicly shamed.
what does this have to do with this post