einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 5 days agoultimate storage hacksh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1893arrow-down123
arrow-up1870arrow-down1external-linkultimate storage hacksh.itjust.workseinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 5 days agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareBrahvim Bhaktvatsal@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkisiZuluarrow-up1·edit-23 days ago…Just asking, just asking: Why is the default FILENAME_MAX on Linux/glibc 4096?
minus-squarebarsoap@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoBecause PATH_MAX is? Also because it’s a 4k page. FILENAME_MAX is not safe to use for buffer allocations btw it could be INT_MAX.
minus-squareBrahvim Bhaktvatsal@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkisiZuluarrow-up1·1 day agoThanks! Got an answer and not 200 downvotes. This is why I love Lemm-Lemm.
…Just asking, just asking: Why is the default
FILENAME_MAX
on Linux/glibc4096
?Because PATH_MAX is? Also because it’s a 4k page.
FILENAME_MAX is not safe to use for buffer allocations btw it could be INT_MAX.
Thanks! Got an answer and not 200 downvotes. This is why I love Lemm-Lemm.