"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agoWere you aware?lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1422arrow-down118
arrow-up1404arrow-down1external-linkWere you aware?lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·4 days agoAnecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·4 days ago… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·4 days agoi get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 days agoSounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
i get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
At least one person gets the joke
Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
thatsthejoke.zip