• Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The zero click searches just haven’t been monetized yet. Don’t worry they are working on it

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Totino’s Pizza Rolls remind you AI makes mistakes, always double check important information. [AD]

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Google is in an interesting predicament. Their ad service brings in so much revenue, but it’s based on search sending traffic to places where those ads are consumed.

    Boost search through Overviews and you’re limiting the effectiveness and reach of your ad service. And to top it off, your search needs content to ingest and remain relevant. But if the ad revenue drops off to websites, they go out of business, so search has less stuff to ingest.

    It’s like a reverse flywheel, where each part is working to harm the other part. People have been pointing this out for the last couple of years, but Google search just keeps adding more to Overviews and choking off the flow.

    And before you say “good, I hate ads,” most of the internet today and its services are paid by ad revenue changing hands. That includes ISPs that host the Fediverse, networking and storage gear makers, pretty much everything to do with open source, and so many jobs that exist to keep the whole thing humming so we can enjoy cat memes.

    If Google (or someone like Cloudflare) doesn’t figure out a way to keep the money flowing, we may be watching a sea shift in how the internet has worked in the last 30 years.

  • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Good?

    Not that I want more AI, but killing the internets business model can only be good for the future of the internet imo.

        • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The wording you chose did not adequately reflect that you were referring to the CEO.

          Rather, it sounds like you are criticizing the OP for sharing an article you do not understand or agree with, as it invited no discourse and only served to criticize, similar to the comments regularly posted below news articles.

          I do agree fully with you that CEOs rarely do work of any value, and their role is basically to siphon money from an organization like the parasites they are.

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Dinghy exactly. The CEO is whining about something nobody wanted, that’s maybe going to go away, and someone gets upset at you saying so? Makes no sense