• AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We have ai models that “think” in the background now. I still agree that they’re not sentient, but where’s the line? How is sentience even defined?

    • MTK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sentient in a nutshell is the ability to feel, be aware and experience subjective reality.

      Can an LLM be sad, happy or aware of itself and the world? No, not by a long shot. Will it tell you that it can if you nudge it? Yes.

      Actual AI might be possible in the future, but right now all we have is really complex networks that can do essentially basic tasks that just look impressive to us because the are inherently using our own communication format.

      If we talk about sentience, LLMs are the equivalent of a petridish of neurons connected to a computer (metaphorically) and only by forming a complex 3d structure like a brain can they really reach sentience.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Can an LLM be sad, happy or aware of itself and the world? No, not by a long shot.

        Can you really prove any of that though?

        • MTK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          Yes, you can debug an LLM to a degree and there are papers that show it. Anyone who understands the technology can tell you that it absolutely lacks any facility to experience