I know this sounds bad, but maybe this is a blessing in disguise. Necessity is the mother of invention and maybe browser technology should be funded by governments instead of privately owned advertising megacorps?

  • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This is great in my opinion. Web browsers are infernally complicated and need to be simplified. CSS is a bloated mess. Javascript is a bloated mess. I would love to see large swathes of both of them eliminated from existence, and maybe the maintenance burden leaves a very small chance that we could start to see some of these technologies starting to get dropped. I personally would love to see web components disappear most of all.

    Regardless, Google really fucked over the web when they decided to add all these unnecessary technologies to Chrome. No doubt a EEE strategy to take over all browser development on the web. Something should have been done much earlier about it, but now we’ll have to see how this mess gets sorted out.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 hours ago

      CSS is a bloated mess. Javascript is a bloated mess.

      Why would less money make people do more work to fix this?

    • eRac@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nobody can make a successful browser that is simpler. The moment a user hits a website that no longer works, they are going back to their old browser.

      All these new features exist because websites replaced every single program most people used. Web browser now have to be capable of doing anything pretty well. It’s not some grand conspiracy to take over the internet, it’s providing the features devs want so they can deliver the things they want in the modern multiplatform no-install world.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Of course developers wanted this. They wanted to push all the complexity into the browser so they didn’t have to worry about it themselves. Google was happy to provide this because it meant that they could be the only ones that could write a browser. That was the “conspiracy” you’re talking about - but it wasn’t a conspiracy, it was more of a strategy on behalf of Google, who knew that they were the only ones that could provide this level of support, and so if they did it, nobody else would be able to compete with them. Even Microsoft gave up on their own engine.

        But the only reason Google could do this is because they were deriving revenue from their advertising monopoly. If their web browser was honestly funded, many, many of the features that we see in Chrome today would have never existed.

        • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Google was happy to provide this because it meant that they could be the only ones that could write a browser.

          Word. That, and so many other things.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Also, I’m not going to argue that things aren’t better for developers today than they were before. Sure, web development is much easier these days. But at the same time, I think web applications are way too overengineered. There are lots of things that could be done in simpler ways - for example, why is it necessary to restyle scrollbars, or reimplement standard components like drop-down menus with reimplementations written entirely in Javascript? Things like this are just stupid and having to drop support for trivial things like this in the name of making browsers simpler is well worth it in my opinion.

        • Kogasa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Dropping support for that stuff means breaking 95% of the websites people currently use. It’s a non-starter, it cannot ever happen, even if you think it would be for the best.

      • barryamelton@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Just compile everything to webassembly and ship that,using your preferred language and libraries.

        Which means that we will get blobs to interact with, instead of JavaScript code that can be “reviewed” or monkey patched away.

        Fun times. Thanks, monopolistic assholes like Goggle, Microsoft and Apple.

    • gencha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is so wild. I really don’t miss Flash, but since Steve killed it with the iPhone, Web development has spent more than 10 years to reinvent the ActionScript3 environment and make the entire web depend on it. And who solely prevented AS3 as a web standard from happening? Chris Wilson, Web Standards Tech Lead at Google, in his former role at browser monopolist Microsoft.

      Today, every single piece of the web is designed by Google to further their business. And all these fucking Electron applications…

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I wasn’t aware of that, but it’s crazy. Thanks for sharing it. The sad truth is that there are probably lots of other standards that didn’t make it into browsers either because Google refused to adopt them in Chrome (JPEG2000 for example, but that’s a complicated ). Google had way too much influence over web standards because they had total control of the web browser.

    • pulido@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s about 100 billion times either to create GUI using Godot than HTML + Javascript + CSS.