• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Letting it roam freely risks it getting hurt and without you being there to help it. It’s not very responsible.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And they’ve been dying in some horrific ways during that time. Now there’s also a lot of extra, human caused dangers. A responsible pet owner wouldn’t subject their pet to such dangers.

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Please elaborate your claims about past and present dangers for pets, I’m curious about specifics.

          Also how are you mitigating the risk of “such dangers” for pets and children?

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Well you might have heard of cars, highways and other such human created things that haven’t existed during all that time.

            Here’s one study where they examined the welfare concerns over unrestricted/unsupervised outdoor access (and other concerns). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7070728/#sec5-animals-10-00258

            Also how are you mitigating the risk of “such dangers” for pets and children?

            I wouldn’t allow a cat or a small child to roam around unrestricted. It just seems due to the inherent threats pretty irresponsible.