Simply said: It’s an open-source version of Reddit, in the same vain that mastodon is an open-source version of Twitter.
its more than that, its decentralised - meaning its not owned by any single entity.
https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2018/12/why-does-decentralization-matter/
That doesn’t mean anything to normal people.
I tried explaining it to my parents and they didn’t understand why that would be a good thing:
"Doesn’t a professional company know better how to run this?
Doesn’t a company have more guarantee to be lawful, because they will be under the magnifier glass compared to a bunch of anonymous individuals?
Why should I trust a bunch of randos with it? Why should I give them my password? […]"
“Why should I trust a bunch of randos with it? Why should I give them my password? […]”
lol that right there you should respond no one should have your PASSWORD (singular) to begin with. Companies large and small have data breaches all the time. If the same password is on more than 5-10 sites, you should assume it’s been compromised by now, and explain that they need a password manager.
Far as it goes with professional companies, we are talking public posting social media, the differences between them are all public, the biggest thing is what they chose to censor. Twitters cool with letting nazi’s speak, but censoring the left. Most lemmy instances are the opposite, but there even are lemmy instances that are backwards with that… which is the point. We all have differing oppinions on where the line should be drawn on acceptable speech, Being able to custom pick one of 50 groups is more likely to find one that works for you, than picking one of 3 social media giants that will have their own rules.
That’s exactly what I am getting at. Just saying “decentralized” doesn’t convey all the info from your long explanation to normal people.
Doesn’t a company have more guarantee to be lawful, because they will be under the magnifier glass compared to a bunch of anonymous individuals?>
As we see every day companies are not held accountable. As for a bunch of individuals the rest of the servers can shun people (deFederate) that are doing unacceptable behavior just like in real life when living in a society.
Hence, in the same vain. They come from mastodon themselves.
In the same vain that Peertube is an ope-source version of YouTube.
From a user experience its a social media site, like reddit.
And an ELI5 for the technical parts:
- It is decentralized which means that no single company owns the whole thing. Anyone can set up a server.
- it is also federated which means that servers can communicate with each other. I am able to see your post even though my server is programming.dev, your server is floss.social, and you posted on lemmy.ml.
An easy analogy that common users can understand is e-mail. E-Mail is also decentralized, everyone has an e-mail address but everyone uses a different e-mail host (the domain name after the “@”). So e.g. “john.doe@gmail.com” has an account at gmail.com but “jane.doe@mailbox.org” has an account at mailbox.org. Both are completely different, yet they can communicate with each other. There’s not one company controlling or storing every single e-mail account or inbox. It’s spread out and everyone can choose the mail provider they like or trust the most.
Then you use that as a bridge to explain Lemmy, or Mastodon, or other Fediverse social media platforms. And remind the listener that single companies having full control over everyone’s accounts is generally bad and opens the door for all sorts of abuse and manipulation or arbitrariness.
It’s like reddit but spread out.
If reddit is one big city, lemmy is dozens of small towns with a good network of public transport between them.
A website.
Too basic.
A social media website.
Wrong community, dude.
