• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I just went back to Debian because Arch kept fucking up my graphics drivers. I have actual work to do, I can’t sit around tinkering on my box all day.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      There’s definitely something to be said for stability. I use stable releases for all my server boxes.

      Arch is fine for a gaming desktop or a desktop you don’t do actual, you know, work, on.

      But for work or servers you need stability.

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Indeed! And the most stable machine is one that is EoL and never gets updates! Nothing breaks if nothing gets updated! That’s why I run IIS on a Vista x64 box!

        🌌🧠

        Spoiler

        DUCK FOR COVER DUCK FOR COVER

        • notabot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          DUCK FOR COVER DUCK FOR COVER

          Quack! *BOOM*

          You can securely run IIS on Vista, you just have to unplug the network and power cables.

      • swab148@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean, you do you, but I do plenty of actual work on my Arch machine. I’ve been working on an album, which involves not just the recording, mixing, and mastering, but also there’s a bunch of paperwork involved in the business side of things, not to mention stuff like album art. I game on it as well, but saying Arch isn’t good for work is just ludicrous. It’s a DIY distro, you get what you put in. A few basic steps can keep Arch just as stable as anything else.

        That said, my server is a Debian machine, but that’s because my services don’t need up to date packages, and I just wanted something I could stick in a corner and forget about.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          A few basic steps can keep Arch just as stable as anything else.

          “stable” in this case means “doesn’t change often”. Is that actually doable with Arch?

          • swab148@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 days ago

            Sure, you don’t have to update every day like I do, it’s a good idea to do it once every quarter since Arch updates it’s keyring around then. My sister runs Endeavour and she hardly ever updates lol