The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on Thursday held that a Massachusetts law banning the sale, transfer, or possession of an assault weapon is not unconstitutional under the Second Amendment to the US Constitution. This decision comes after Massachusetts resident, Joseph Capen, contended that he was planning on purchasing items covered by the law for purposes of self-defense.

Case file: https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/myvmjqrbdpr/04172027mass.pdf

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Not exactly. For those who have that concern, I’m not sure any firearm will solve their problem, let alone a more extreme version of one

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      2nd amendment was meant as a checks and balance for exactly the situation that is happening right now.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        And it has never and will NEVER be used that way. Wouldn’t work even if people all stood up to try and use it that way

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Americans are legally allowed to use guns to take down everyone wearing golden trump pin in the white house and they would get away with it in the court afterwards as long as they get every single sympathyzer.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      When you’re already about to be shipped to a concentration camp to die, you have nothing to lose by trying to take some of them with you.