• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Fedora did it almost immediately

      It is pretty clear Arch doesn’t seem to car about shipping license encumbered software

      • badmin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        There is nothing illegal about packaging Redis, or other open-source projects depending on it, irrespective of jurisdiction.

        And Arch has no customers to worry about if they accidentally depend on a package that restricts closed-source commercialization, not that it’s a distro’s job to pick on that anyway. Commercial entities are supposed to have a process that checks the licenses of all dependencies. If you know how to reliably avoid AGPL, then you know how to reliably avoid RSAL and SSPL.

        And I’m liking the cognitive dissonance of dissing Redis while praising Red Hat 🙂

      • Olap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        That isn’t it’s primary reason for existence, and it is essentially a volunteer driven org. And so if no-one was going to adopt the package, we have to wait for the maintainer to find some time. https://archlinux.org/packages/?packager=freswa - here’s some of the 167 packages maintained by the last toucher of the Redis package

        Thank you Frederik!