cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square620fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down116cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1external-linkOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square620fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareGreyfoxsolid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoIt will never be over. We will either be the ones dominant in this area, or it won’t be us. If it’s not us, well, the consequences could be dire.
minus-squareeestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI fail to see the significance of not being dominant in bullshit generation, which is OpenAIs specialty. Non-LLM machine learning is more interesting, but “write me a poem about how you’re my loving ai waifu” is just not a strategic resource.
minus-squareGreyfoxsolid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI didn’t think you’ve thought it through to it’s logical conclusion, and your example shows a demeaning attitude towards what AI can currently be used for. When you reduce it to what you view as ridiculous uses, you become lacking in the facts.
It will never be over. We will either be the ones dominant in this area, or it won’t be us. If it’s not us, well, the consequences could be dire.
I fail to see the significance of not being dominant in bullshit generation, which is OpenAIs specialty.
Non-LLM machine learning is more interesting, but “write me a poem about how you’re my loving ai waifu” is just not a strategic resource.
I didn’t think you’ve thought it through to it’s logical conclusion, and your example shows a demeaning attitude towards what AI can currently be used for. When you reduce it to what you view as ridiculous uses, you become lacking in the facts.