cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 months agoOh well...lemmy.mlimagemessage-square166fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageOh well...lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square166fedilink
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 months agoAny time someone is terminated without cause, the employer simply doesn’t provide a reason for termination. They’re not required to.
minus-squarehalcyoncmdr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoNot telling someone why you are firing them isn’t a magical lawsuit avoidance option. In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the courts take context into account specifically because of shitty companies/managers trying to hide behind exactly that.
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoJust because they don’t give the reason doesn’t mean the reason can’t be proven.
Any time someone is terminated without cause, the employer simply doesn’t provide a reason for termination. They’re not required to.
Not telling someone why you are firing them isn’t a magical lawsuit avoidance option. In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the courts take context into account specifically because of shitty companies/managers trying to hide behind exactly that.
Just because they don’t give the reason doesn’t mean the reason can’t be proven.