Yes but this is a computer and not just a RAID enclosure, so while your math is correct it doesn’t really discount the utility/value. It’s like comparing a switch and an Xbox when somebody explicitly wants a handheld machine

This is bad information. You do not need to roll your own VPN.

Bummed they didn’t do FMV’s for the main cast. I’d have loved to shoot that tbh haha

Good point about the controls. I forgot about the BG3 controller/console experience.

Looks more like a classic tactics game. XCOM and such.

You’re gonna have a very hard time convincing me that even a proportionality of switch owners bought it for the motion sensors. Let’s see some numbers.

I also don’t understand how you can say that and “the tech is irrelevant“ in the same comment? Those two ideas bump.

If your argument is “Nintendo is for kids“ I think you’re going to have a hard time selling me on that one too. “PS is too hard and inappropriate for children” is definitely a novel argument I’ll give you that.

No the greatest strength Nintendo has is its first party library. Full stop. Want to play Mario? Gotta have a Nintendo. Want to play Zelda? Still Nintendo. Etc

I haven’t done a comment purge in almost a week so you are lying. Unless you’ve stalked me for almost a week?

Where is “here”?

The PS5 digital omission was massive and you know it.

Where did I give them a free pass? Show me

I don’t where you are but in the US:

• Switch 2 will be $450

• Xbox Series S is $250, not $300

• PS5 digital - which is exactly the same but no disc drive - is $400. I don’t know why you left that out except…well yeah it’s obvious why. Because it’s cheaper than a switch 2.

I can also guarantee you you’ll get a Series X for $450 before you’ll get a switch 2 for that price, which will inevitably be scalped to hell for months to come. So the switch 2 will be the 3rd most expensive console on the market behind the PS5 Pro and the Xbox Series X at best, likely just the PS5 pro.

Also: neither Sony nor Microsoft charges $80 for a standard edition game. And let me tell you, I hate Microsoft in particular so it chaps my ass to give them any credit.

deleted by creator

I think I will seek other means to play their games

I knew that. Is this supposed to be some sort of trap to show I’m inconsistent or something?

What on earth are you referencing and what’s with all the hostility? Ease off the gas dude

I guarantee you anything that is “4K“ on Nintendo requires a lot of caveats

Who would I be astroturfing for? You can’t just point at anybody you disagree with and go “astroturfing” as if it’s a magical incantation that makes them go away. A lot of people are critical of Nintendo, I know you know that. My stance should not be all that surprising even if you disagree with it.

I just think Nintendo charges way too much for their games and they charge too much for hardware that is long in the tooth at launch. I get it, the only way to play a Nintendo game is on their hardware and they’re so good they justify the cost. I’ve heard theargument, I respect it, But ultimately I just think the prices are ridiculous either way.

that’s outrageous example request makes it clear you’re not actually entertaining any sort of counter argument

Have you seen the specs of the switch 2? Why does Nintendo keep getting away with charging premium for dated hardware with mediocre specs? I get the games are good but come on

For how long in the tooth the hardware is/how dated the specs are? Yes, outrageously priced.

You can’t be this dense. I’m done.