• BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bluesky is pretty fun and I’m glad he’s not there shitting it up anymore. I’ve only seen one nutsack on there so far.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bluesky hasn’t been hyper-commoditized yet. I don’t see ads everywhere. I don’t have bots jamming ׺°”˜”°º× 🎀 𝒫𝓊𝓈𝓈𝓎 𝐼𝓃 𝐵𝒾♡ 🎀 ׺°”˜”°º× into my feed. I’m not being spammed with “We noticed you haven’t joined our premium service yet, but for $8/mo we’ll stop showing you this message!” annoyance marketing.

      But I’ve got no doubt its coming. It just hasn’t hit that Twitter-level critical mass of users, such that enshittification turns a profit rather than curbing adoption.

      • Garry@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Between threads mastadon and bluesky, which one do you think will be the biggest in the next year? Or are they gonna all keep living in the shadow of Twitter

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mastodon is more of a platform than a single service. Truth Social is, for instance, an insurance of Mastodon that hasn’t been updated since 2022.

          Or are they gonna all keep living in the shadow of Twitter

          Practically speaking, the future is probably Threads/Facebook/IG. They seems to have encircled social media and strangled it.

          But that’s at a national/global scale. Outside of Lemmy style message boards, I don’t really fuck with social media anymore.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It just hasn’t hit that Twitter-level critical mass of users

        Twitter used to be bigger than it is now and it also used to have less spam. So clearly size isn’t the problem.

        The problem with twitter is Musk fired all the people who spent their day figuring out how to hide (or just delete) shitty content.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Twitter used to be bigger than it is now and it also used to have less spam. So clearly size isn’t the problem.

          Twitter usage surged significantly prior to the Musk buyout. In 2010 they had 40M. They crested 400M users by 2020.

          That’s the difference between growing your base and harvesting them.

          Bluesky has in the neighborhood of 5-6M, by comparison.

  • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that Bluesky has some form of content moderation and has occasionally banned users for things like using racial slurs in their usernames.

    Actually, Jack Dorsey may be the problem. Good to see him shift focus to that “free speech”, pro-cryptocurrency platform Nostr. I see it like a containment zone for the worst people.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think that it’s hard to find a level of content control that everyone is happy with. I’d favor fewer restrictions.

      But that’s one thing that’s nice about the Threadiverse model – it’s federated. You can have one set of restrictions on one instance, and another on another.

      Beehaw has pretty good conversation. I enjoy my discussions on their communities. They have a pretty upbeat mood. It also has an extremely low bar for defederation – it’s defederated with even lemmy.world. I don’t like that, would not use that as my home instance.

      My home instance is lemmy.today. The admin there is aiming for not defederating with anyone. I like that. But…not everyone wants that.

      Point is, there can be multiple levels of content moderation on the Threadiverse, both at the instance and community level, and people who have different preferences can have the level of moderation that they want. Some people take a free-speech-absolutist position. Others want a safe space. Some people don’t want pornography on their forums. Some people only want certain types of pornography. Some people take issue with certain types of political radicalism. Some people want to associate with Threads users, and others do not.

      I think that that’s maybe the best of all worlds.