It is a half baked review, IMO. The author says that despite having 45 W charging, the phone takes 75 mins to charge. Samsung really slows down it’s charging speeds post 80%, so testing from 0 to 100 is not a good criterion at all.

Plus, he forgets to mention that Samsung skips on a microSD card for A56 which was present on A55. Though in Samsung’s favor, they are offering 6 OS upgrades and I doubt any other OEM except Google matches it.

  • BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My $350AU (~$200US) Motorola G84 has been near perfect for the price. Only the camera sucks a bit, and Facebook Messenger notifications are unreliable; but it shits all over the A20.A30 I had before. Of course, Motorola is a gamble itself though - for example with this phone, you can’t use the camera if you’re connected to 5G on some networks, and they won’t fix it.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Remember when it was a joke that the iPhone cost that much? “It’s $500, you have no choice of carrier, the battery doesn’t hold a charge, and the reception isn’t very…”

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Not to be on Samsung’s side, but maybe they slowed the end charge to avoid any battery overcharge issues?

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I think even some Chinese OEMs throttle somewhat post 80% (and/or give user the option to limit charging upto that point only). I have a spare entry level Samsung phone. It supports 25 W charging though it gets very slow post 80%. It’s not a big deal because the battery capacity is good and with an efficient chipset and 60Hz display, it does way better than my main Realme phone which I need to charge almost twice daily.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    My personal experience with Samsung phones is that they are rubbish, slow, full of bloat you can’t remove. Maybe the high end are good, but the A-series have no business being so bad for the price.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The bloat! It used to be apps but now it is baked in with knox, samsung services, ugh

      I have been thinking about getting a S24 Ultra purrly for its AI less flagship position with stylus but I cannot pull the trigger on a samsung device.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I loved them, I had the Z flagships for a few years. Their naming convention absolutely sucks but given camera is a priority for me they are top of the list but they are a little overpriced to be honest.

          I am looking at getting a Sony Xperia Z 1 V second hand, still a grand though

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They’ve gotten a bit better with this lately I think. Although it has certainly gotten slower over the years, my A52 4G is definitely still usable despite being released over 4yr ago as a mid-range phone.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I hate the mandatory “updates” which is only a prompt to install “suggested” apps. Even when deselecting everything, it still starts downloading TEMU. Fuck that.

  • lowleveldata@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Do they really have no microSD card slot or is it one of those that you can use 2 sim or 1 sim + 1 microSD?

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    the A series as a whole has been nothing but a disappointment from my observations. The a50, 51 and 52 have all sucked, the a11 and a12 series were subpar at best and the a20/21 series might as well not existed.

    after the third continuous series of disappointment I stopped following the series though so maybe it’s better.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      But in the vast seas of phones, Lineage OS still supports a very small subset. Major players like Google or Samsung are covered but a LOT are skipped.

      If one’s phone supports Lineage OS, well and good but it’s not a fix all

      • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If you have the technical-know-how and the patience, you can install LineageOS on unsupported devices. It might be unstable but, again, if you know what you are doing, you can get around many of the issues.

    • kalpol@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Make sure the cell provider hasn’t banned the model. AT&T banned a bunch of perfectly good unlockable international phones and kept the locked local ones not supporting lineage. They still work of course, just can’t make calls.