• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    This symbol isn’t needed for spells this long, but it’s considered best practice and other wizards will make fun of me for not including it, even though it isn’t needed.

    • DerArzt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      My brother in Christ, why must you inform us of cool things and leave us with less free time? 🫠

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Interesting. Does this provide any game balance whatsoever?

      I spent an embarrassing amount of time trying to design magic systems when I was a teenager, but they always ended up being either way too powerful or not “rich” enough to be interesting. It’s just really hard to design a simple mechanical system that stays within arbitrary human boundaries.

      Hmm, I feel myself getting drawn back in. That’s almost like a zero-knowledge proof, and there’s lots of weird ways to implement cryptographic primitives.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        no, it does not. there is a rune that consumes amethyst but it’s just for flavour, so you can give your spell a cost if you want.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        i guess you could say the learning curve is a balance feature. it’s an entire functional programming language in a pretty unergonomic form factor, so actually building spells that do anything impressive takes a lot of time.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Only until you’ve figured it out, at which point you’re god. You could make it non-repeatable somehow to avoid that, but magic is depicted as being mainly old, repeated spells most of the time, like in the comic. You could also move to something like Brainfuck or even Malbolge where coding a single new program is hard. As I learned the hard way, though, you’re still going to have no control over what ends up being easy and what’s not.

          Actually, it’s more like homeomorphic encryption since you have a system of some bounded complexity instead of a single fixed piece of information. That’s usually harder, but then again you actually want the scheme to be “insecure” in this case.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    “Oh, dude, you gotta stop using TJ’s Action Rune of Changed Files. That runebook has a backdoor to one of the hells now. Didn’t you see the patch notes?”

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      I never update my spell book and nothing bad has ever happened.

      Help. Infernal imps somehow got inside my sanctum and used my scrying orb to send rude messages to the rest of the Circle.

    • dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      whats that? i use yenjis discus checker scroll, i know it was abandoned long ago back in the old days of the spell assemblers (when they were still a thing) but IT. JUST. WORKS. i dont need those fancy new features, i just want to see if the runes and incantations written on my magic discus got corrupt or not.

  • Ethan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    If you’re adding code you don’t understand to a production system you should be fired

    Edit: I assumed it was obvious from context that I’m referring to copy-pasting code from stack overflow or an LLM or whatever without knowing what it does but apparently that needs to be said explicitly.